Teams

ACAC Singh

2023 Richmond Adult 65 & Over Men · Richmond Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-12vs Belmont ThorntonWon 20
W#1 DoublesJerry Cole / Don Caffery vs Michael Anderson / Earl Meekins6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael Blackburn / Craik Goodspeed vs Bob Denue / Tom May6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-06-05vs Belmont ThorntonWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Blackburn / Jerry Cole vs Bob Denue / Earl Meekins6-4, 6-1
2023-05-22vs Belmont ThorntonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJerry Cole / Michael Blackburn vs Earl Meekins / James Dugger6-0, 6-3
2023-05-15vs Belmont ThorntonLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Blackburn / Don Caffery vs James Dugger / Earl Meekins3-6, 5-7
2023-05-08vs Belmont ThorntonLost 01
L#1 DoublesJerry Cole / Craik Goodspeed vs Earl Meekins / James Dugger4-6, 5-7
2023-05-01vs Belmont ThorntonLost 01
L#1 DoublesJerry Cole / Karl Koenig vs James Dugger / Earl Meekins3-6, 5-7
2023-04-24vs Belmont ThorntonWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Blackburn / Jerry Cole vs Michael Anderson / James Dugger3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-17vs Belmont ThorntonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJerry Cole / Michael Blackburn vs Michael Anderson / Earl Meekins6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Jerry Cole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Craik Goodspeed
published 4
3.59
Michael Blackburn
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.55
Jonathan Brew
published
3.42
Anant Singh
published 3.5
3.41
Karl Koenig
published
3.23
Randolph Moore
published
Steve Shannon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jerry Cole + Michael Blackburn20561% games+8.5% vs expected
Randolph Moore + Karl Koenig1443% gamesnot enough data
Anant Singh + Steve Shannon213 matchesnot enough data
Anant Singh + Karl Koenig123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jerry Cole
165W–65L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Craik Goodspeed
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Michael Blackburn
172W–174L career · 6 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.59
Jonathan Brew
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Anant Singh
33W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
Karl Koenig
12W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
Randolph Moore
22W–26L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Steve Shannon
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.