← Teams

THPRD-Ross-Brockett/Birge

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.93 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Cynthia Ross-Brockett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Suki Birge
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #1 Singles 44% · published 3
2.80
Barbara Bomar
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
—
Cindy Bennett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Theresa Hagerty
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.67
Megan Clifford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.46
Rosalie Trevejo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Results10 ties
2025-05-30Lost 1–2
L#1 SinglesSuki Birge vs Josette Zervic6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPriscilla Connolly / Cindy Bennett vs Yan Morrissey / Samina Panwhar6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHeidi Stutzman / Rosalie Trevejo vs Laurel Soot / Lee Gates6-2, 7-5
2025-05-18Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesMegan Clifford / Theresa Hagerty vs Shannon Davis / Jennifer Oh6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCynthia Ross-Brockett / Anastasiya Vinokur vs Greta Miracle / Joanna Asia Wagner6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-05-10Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesAnastasiya Vinokur / Cynthia Ross-Brockett vs Amy Vandenbroucke / Vanessa Weber6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSuki Birge vs Nicola Ash6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMegan Clifford / Theresa Hagerty vs Erin Mader / Christina Bergstrom6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCindy Bennett / Erin Doucet vs Elizabeth Hayes / Michelle Ellett6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-05-03Split 1–1
L#1 SinglesSuki Birge vs Adrienne Dedelow6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCindy Bennett / Theresa Hagerty vs Maria Rivero-Gore / Elizabeth Large6-2, 6-1
2025-04-27Lost 1–2
L#1 SinglesBarbara Bomar vs Ashley Sajadi3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnastasiya Vinokur / Cynthia Ross-Brockett vs Lisa Mayer / Susanne Cochran6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTheresa Hagerty / Priscilla Connolly vs Laura Berner / Jennifer Trank7-5, 6-1
2025-04-12Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesCynthia Ross-Brockett / Priscilla Connolly vs Greta Miracle / Jennifer Oh6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHeidi Stutzman / Rosalie Trevejo vs Kim Wallace / Gwen Kulak6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSuki Birge vs Jeanne Sinnott6-3, 6-3
2025-04-05Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesRosalie Trevejo / Heidi Stutzman vs Ashley Sajadi / Cricket Forsey6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesBarbara Bomar vs Megan Mandel6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTheresa Hagerty / Priscilla Connolly vs Lillian Lee / Rhonda Baker6-2, 6-1
2025-03-29Won 1–0
W#2 SinglesSuki Birge vs Brooke Henderson2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-12-07Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesMiwako Kobayashi / Cynthia Ross-Brockett vs Leslie Sampson / Julia Plowman6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMegan Clifford / Priscilla Connolly vs Ashley Bevan / Tracy Laidley6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeidi Stutzman / Rosalie Trevejo vs Kathy Cooke / Angela Jackson6-3, 6-4
2024-12-06Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesMargaret Sivertsen / Cynthia Ross-Brockett vs Seungja Shin / Mihee Park6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Cynthia Ross-Brockett
119W–97L career
0%96%4%
2.89
3
Suki Birge
61W–80L career
0%98%1%
2.81
3
Barbara Bomar
5W–9L career
1%96%3%
2.80
3
Cindy Bennett
47W–62L career
not enough data
—
3
Theresa Hagerty
71W–56L career
4%96%0%
2.69
3
Megan Clifford
65W–60L career
7%93%0%
2.67
2.5
Rosalie Trevejo
28W–41L career
0%48%52%
2.46

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.