Teams

WH Mahaney FWL A18-3.0W

2022 WMI FWL USTA League Adult 18&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI FWL A18&O 3.0 W (8 player)

15 players · average NTRP 3.20 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-12-10vs MY Douma FWL A18-3.0WWon 40
W#1 DoublesROSEANN BLAHNIK / Kimberly KIngsbury Curvelo vs Kris Drews / Rose Roth-Bowersock6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesStella Chivikas vs Beth Batts6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnna Clement / Ginger Owen vs Lynda Rhodes / Josette Gatchalian6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKatelyn Lennon vs Christine Douma6-3, 6-0
2021-12-03vs MVH Kanis FWL A18-3.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesConnie Kamerling / Karen Heggen-Cheng vs Susan Griffith / Kristen Hagan6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristine Mahaney / Margaret Cancro vs Mary Elling / Kelli Hoeksema6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesROSEANN BLAHNIK / Ginger Owen vs Ann Radke / Michelle Scripps6-4, 6-0
2021-11-19vs MVS Stevens FWL A18-3.0WWon 31
W#1 DoublesConnie Kamerling / Karen Heggen-Cheng vs Sandra Huffman / Amy Stevens3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesROSEANN BLAHNIK vs Mia Helweg6-7, 5-3
L#2 DoublesMargaret Cancro / Corin Nulty vs Mary McMahon / Margaret Greydanus2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKimberly KIngsbury Curvelo / Eugenia Velazquez vs Rosemary Heule / Teresa Konyndyk6-3, 5-5
2019-01-11vs MVH Kanis FWL A18-3.0WWon 31
W#1 DoublesJalynn Schnr / Kimberly KIngsbury Curvelo vs Alice Zlotucha / Sandra Price6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKaren Heggen-Cheng vs Lisa Schulz6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEugenia Velazquez / Lupe Velazquez vs Traci Bosch / Rachel Schipper6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNANCY KRAPF / Margaret Cancro vs Amy Karp / Mary Westenbroek6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WMI FWL A18&O 3.0 W (8 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WH Mahaney FWL A18-3.0W5122820189
2PA Avery FWL A18-3.0W5121921201
3MVS Vincent FWL A18-3.0W42161432248
4MVS Stevens FWL A18-3.0W33151532261
5HC Irish FWL A18-3.0W24121838273
6MY Douma FWL A18-3.0W24102043283
7MVH Kanis FWL A18-3.0W0692145298

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Corin Nulty
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Stella Chivikas
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.14
Christine Mahaney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Kimberly KIngsbury Curvelo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Therese Miller
published
2.89
ROSEANN BLAHNIK
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.85
Connie Kamerling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Margaret Cancro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Anna Clement
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Ginger Owen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Eugenia Velazquez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Heggen-Cheng
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Katelyn Lennon
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Lupe Velazquez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sheryl Farrell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Cancro + Corin Nulty2357% games+12.7% vs expected
Connie Kamerling + ROSEANN BLAHNIK8258% games+8.4% vs expected
Connie Kamerling + Ginger Owen3356% games+8.3% vs expected
ROSEANN BLAHNIK + Therese Miller5354% games+5.3% vs expected
Kimberly KIngsbury Curvelo + ROSEANN BLAHNIK161350% games+3.3% vs expected
Ginger Owen + Therese Miller3745% games+2.2% vs expected
Anna Clement + Margaret Cancro5257% games+2.0% vs expected
Christine Mahaney + Kimberly KIngsbury Curvelo71344% games+0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Corin Nulty
87W–38L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.39
Stella Chivikas
82W–56L career · 1 line in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Christine Mahaney
46W–65L career · 1 line in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
Kimberly KIngsbury Curvelo
51W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
2.98
Therese Miller
83W–92L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.96
ROSEANN BLAHNIK
98W–76L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Connie Kamerling
89W–104L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
Margaret Cancro
47W–75L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Anna Clement
24W–33L career · 1 line in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Ginger Owen
47W–69L career · 2 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
Eugenia Velazquez
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Heggen-Cheng
44W–44L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Katelyn Lennon
19W–5L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Lupe Velazquez
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Sheryl Farrell
14W–32L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.