Teams

ELW Fries

2023 Pinellas Adult 55 & Over Weekend Winter · 7.0 W Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-03-11vs ELW UselisLost 01
L#3 DoublesMartha Cornatzer / Stacey Castellini vs Mary Bandes / Amy Burns6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-03-04vs Seminole Lake PacemakersLost 02
L#2 DoublesMartha Cornatzer / Regina Hlapatsos vs January Moennig / Kristen Pierce1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNoella Burgeson / Stacey Castellini vs Patty Anderson / Ann Worthington0-6, 2-6
2023-02-04vs Pinellas/Tarpon HellmersSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAna Jara / Noella Burgeson vs B Sue Wyman / Barbera Loy6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStacey Castellini / Martha Cornatzer vs Ellen Hellmers / Ellan Hubbard4-6, 2-6
2023-01-28Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRegina Hlapatsos / Martha Cornatzer vs Virginia Jones / Denise Simon5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2023-01-07vs Seminole Lake PacemakersWon 10
W#3 DoublesMartha Cornatzer / Regina Hlapatsos vs Cindy Ferguson / Kristen Pierce2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Andrea Villafranca
published 3.5
3.07
Noella Burgeson
published
3.06
Martha Cornatzer
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.04
Ana Jara
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Stacey Castellini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.87
Noela Fries
published
Liwen Tao
published
Regina Hlapatsos
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacey Castellini + Martha Cornatzer51941% gamesnot enough data
Ana Jara + Martha Cornatzer3546% gamesnot enough data
Ana Jara + Noella Burgeson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrea Villafranca
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Noella Burgeson
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Martha Cornatzer
117W–130L career · 5 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
3.5
Ana Jara
47W–71L career · 1 line in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.04
3.5
Stacey Castellini
23W–59L career · 3 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
Noela Fries
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
2.87
Kathleen Annichiarico
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Liwen Tao
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Regina Hlapatsos
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.