Teams

Huffman/Knoxville

2025 Tri-Level 40 & Over-Knoxville · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-03-28vs Snyder/KnoxvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichele Hall Craig / Lindsey Stimets vs Rita Edlein / Angela Strange5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJen Rose / Ginger Arthur vs Sarah Attkisson / Gina Grubbs6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-02vs ThackstonWon 10
W#2 DoublesGinger Arthur / Tara Osborne-Martz vs Stephanie Bonovich / Julia Connor4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-03-01vs Williams/KnoxvilleWon 10
W#2 DoublesGinger Arthur / Linda Bui vs Maureen Groer / Susan Pappas6-2, 6-0
2025-03-01vs BrowningDabbs/KnoxvilleWon 10
W#2 DoublesBarbara Miller / Lisa Perkey vs Lori Brown / Lauren Clarke7-6, 7-6
2025-02-09vs Snyder/KnoxvilleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBarbara Miller / Lisa Perkey vs Lindsay McNabb / Angela Strange6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJen Rose / Ginger Arthur vs Terri Bowers / Courtney Dyer6-0, 6-2
2025-02-08vs Duong/KnoxvilleSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDebi English / Cindi Mooney vs Sheri Kilbey / Correna Dickson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaola Martinez / Karen Collins vs Rosa Luttrell / Kimberly Morris6-1, 0-6, 0-1
2025-02-01vs ThackstonLost 01
L#2 DoublesJen Rose / Ginger Arthur vs Gina Hovis / Leslie Lischer4-6, 3-6
2025-02-01vs Brown/KnoxvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesBarbara Miller / Lisa Perkey vs Jennifer Douglas / Wendy Petty5-7, 1-6
2025-01-18vs Tri40/HOUCKWon 10
W#3 DoublesPaola Martinez / Angie Goodwyn vs Tammy Shrivalle / Donna French6-4, 6-3
2025-01-18vs ParksLost 01
L#2 DoublesJen Rose / Sandy Garrard vs Lake Bailey / Pearl Jhala3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Lindsey Stimets
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Michele Hall Craig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Lisa Perkey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Debi English
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Paola Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Megan Haselschwerdt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.35
Jennifer Collins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Rosa Luttrell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Lisa Huffman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Ginger Arthur
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.77
Courtney Hammontree
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Jen Rose
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Hall Craig + Lindsey Stimets5068% games+13.4% vs expected
Debi English + Megan Haselschwerdt6165% games+12.6% vs expected
Lisa Huffman + Paola Martinez6254% games−0.7% vs expected
Lindsey Stimets + Lisa Perkey6068% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Huffman + Megan Haselschwerdt224 matchesnot enough data
Ginger Arthur + Jen Rose314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Collins + Rosa Luttrell123 matchesnot enough data
Lindsey Stimets + Megan Haselschwerdt303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsey Stimets
41W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Michele Hall Craig
19W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Lisa Perkey
29W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
3.5
Debi English
35W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.55
Paola Martinez
56W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Megan Haselschwerdt
25W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
Jennifer Collins
28W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Rosa Luttrell
26W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Lisa Huffman
17W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Ginger Arthur
26W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.90
3
Courtney Hammontree
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Jen Rose
23W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.