Teams

MPTC - Love Actually

2025 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Doubles Friday · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-11vs The Houstonian - Baby Got BackhandLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnna Davidson / Shawn Savarino vs Jennifer Pillion / Sandra Modonese3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Steele / Tricia Swen vs Erika Ballard / Amy Hart5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesClaire Smith / Kate Cavanaugh vs Fara Ebrahimy / Sarah Ebrahimi6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnne Hughes / Sonali Morris vs Kate Tamminga / Sandra Modonese4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Lane / Carrie Lium vs Jennifer Pillion / Shawna Wade4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Emily Robertson
published
3.45
Joanna Strachan
published
3.35
Carrie Field
published 3.5
Anna Davidson
published 3.5
3.25
Shawn Savarino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Becca Gips
published 3.5
3.21
Sonali Morris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Tricia Swen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Melanie Steele
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Carrie Lium
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Sarah Lane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Anne Hughes
published
Kate Cavanaugh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Steele + Shawn Savarino213 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Steele + Tricia Swen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Robertson
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Joanna Strachan
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Carrie Field
3W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Anna Davidson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shawn Savarino
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Becca Gips
4W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Sonali Morris
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Tricia Swen
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Melanie Steele
14W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Carrie Lium
8W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Sarah Lane
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
Anne Hughes
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kate Cavanaugh
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.