Teams

McGuire, Juli

2023 Adult 18 & Over Summer 2.5W - 5.0 · 3.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 2.75 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-06-29vs Finn, KellyLost 13
W#1 DoublesRebekah Parish / Taylor Albritton vs Laura Bong / Emma Rieper7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCarey Mollet vs ERIN ALEXANDER1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAmber Morgan / Kati Purmort vs Kelly Finn / Cheryl Bicknell4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesLauren Surface vs Janae Likens3-6, 4-6
2023-05-11vs Mowery, ShellyLost 12
L#1 DoublesJuli McGuire / Rebekah Parish vs Shelly Mowery / Heather Jorns7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSara Johnson / Taylor Albritton vs Krissi Wagner / Michelle Coffey6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSarah Baldelomar / Sarah Daniel vs Paulette Prieb / Marti Lilja4-6, 5-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Sarah Baldelomar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Kati Purmort
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Amber Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Corinne Espinoza
published 3
2.73
Carey Mollet
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.70
Juli McGuire
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Ashley Hiatt
published 2.5
Audra Laughman
published 2.5
Gina Marshall
published 2.5
Lauren Surface
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Melissa Sherwood
published
Rebekah Parish
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rhonda Gaffney
published
Sarah Daniel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Taylor Albritton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juli McGuire + Taylor Albritton303 matchesnot enough data
Juli McGuire + Rebekah Parish033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Baldelomar
30W–17L career · 1 line in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
Kati Purmort
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Amber Morgan
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3
Corinne Espinoza
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Carey Mollet
9W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Juli McGuire
18W–43L career · 1 line in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
2.5
Ashley Hiatt
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
0%89%11%
2.34
2.5
Audra Laughman
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Gina Marshall
9W–34L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lauren Surface
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Sherwood
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebekah Parish
7W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rhonda Gaffney
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Daniel
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Taylor Albritton
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.