Teams

KCurley (Raintree)

2024 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-11vs BBaker (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKimberlee Curley vs Brittany Baker6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-07-31vs PSweeney (Firethorne CC)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesVicky Shannon vs Wendy Hall4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSuzanne MacVicar vs Renu Renu Gill6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesCrissa Klein vs Sue Ann Lang4-6, 0-6
2024-07-10vs ESuppa (PCC)Won 20
W#2 SinglesVicky Shannon vs Larissa Soto6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMelissa Moloney vs Elizabeth Suppa7-6, 6-2
2024-07-03vs KDay (OPRC)Won 21
W#1 SinglesKimberlee Curley vs Katie Archer1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCrissa Klein vs Angie Mehrizi3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesSuzanne MacVicar vs Lisa Bottle6-1, 6-2
2024-06-26vs TInga (Life Time)Won 10
W#3 SinglesMelissa Moloney vs Linda Jo Mastrangelo6-0, 6-0
2024-06-19vs KCronin (Piper Glen)Split 11
L#2 SinglesKimberlee Curley vs Amy DeLaat Marbury4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesSuzanne MacVicar vs Maria Leahy5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-06-14vs BBaker (Queens)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesKimberlee Curley vs Elizabeth Miars2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMelissa Moloney vs Kathy Kopec6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesCrissa Klein vs Dayna Sheehan2-6, 0-6
2024-05-29vs PSweeney (Firethorne CC)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesVicky Shannon vs TARA RAND2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Susan Chandler
published
2.83
Suzanne MacVicar
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.83
Kimberlee Curley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.77
Vicky Shannon
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.73
Kimberly Powell
published
2.73
Melissa Moloney
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.55
Kelly Wolff
published
2.43
Crissa Klein
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Paula Abrams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Wolff + Crissa Klein7360% games+7.3% vs expected
Suzanne MacVicar + Crissa Klein5552% games+5.2% vs expected
Suzanne MacVicar + Kimberly Powell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Chandler
35W–30L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Suzanne MacVicar
89W–101L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Kimberlee Curley
46W–67L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Vicky Shannon
87W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
Kimberly Powell
18W–29L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Melissa Moloney
23W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
Kelly Wolff
23W–40L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
2.5
Crissa Klein
50W–62L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%71%29%
2.43
Paula Abrams
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.