Teams

Sanginario/Murfreesboro

2025 Tri-Level 18 & over Monday · hybrid

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-04vs McCord/Samik/MurfreesboroWon 20
W#1 DoublesKyle Sanginario / David Goodwin vs Ryan Cluff / Michael Birchler7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTaylor Vandever / Kenny Sallis vs Jared Bramlett / Tyler Little6-2, 6-2
2025-07-28vs McCord/Samik/MurfreesboroWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Goodwin / Alexander Mitchell vs Ryan Cluff / Seth Strickland6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJustin Davis / Jose Antequera vs Stephen Severn / Jason Bockman6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKenny Sallis / Taylor Vandever vs Jared Bramlett / Tyler Little6-3, 6-2
2025-07-21vs McCord/Samik/MurfreesboroLost 12
L#1 DoublesTJ Byars / Kyle Sanginario vs Ryan Cluff / Tim Wright4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJose Antequera / Justin Davis vs Mark Samikkannu / Jason Bockman1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKenny Sallis / Jesse Harrison vs Tren Halladay / Jared Bramlett6-0, 6-0
2025-07-17vs McCord/Samik/MurfreesboroSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKyle Sanginario / Alexander Mitchell vs Matt McCord / Seth Strickland3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJesse Harrison / Taylor Vandever vs Tyler Little / Tren Halladay7-5, 6-2
2025-07-14vs McCord/Samik/MurfreesboroWon 21
L#1 DoublesTJ Byars / David Goodwin vs Tim Wright / Matt McCord5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJose Antequera / Justin Davis vs Stephen Severn / Michael Pirtle6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTaylor Vandever / Jesse Harrison vs Tren Halladay / Tyler Little6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for hybrid have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alexander Mitchell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Kyle Sanginario
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Jesse Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Taylor Vandever
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Kenny Sallis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jose Antequera
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Matthew Adams
published
TJ Byars
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Taylor Vandever + Jesse Harrison314 matchesnot enough data
Taylor Vandever + Kenny Sallis303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alexander Mitchell
2W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kyle Sanginario
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Jesse Harrison
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Taylor Vandever
16W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Kenny Sallis
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.42
Jose Antequera
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Adams
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
TJ Byars
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.