Teams

GEPTA/18&overMX/4.0/Cisneros/EPTC#3

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.92 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2026 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Armando Landa
usually #1 Singles 35%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.86
Gabriel Alvarez
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.80
Andre Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #1 Singles 18% · published 4
3.64
Bianca Loya
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.59
Brianna Barreiro
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.59
Hector Montalvo
usually #2 Doubles 28%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 3.5
Juan Pablo Becerra
usually #1 Singles 31%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Katherine Haycraft
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 42% · published
Marcelle Fernandez
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Mauricio Cisneros
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Monica Montalvo
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Omar Abbud
usually #1 Doubles 32%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Paulina Caraveo
usually #2 Singles 30%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Rocio Molina
usually #3 Doubles 37%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Victor Tapia
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published
Yvana Sanchez
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Omar Abbud + Katherine Haycraft7165% gamesnot enough data
Omar Abbud + Mauricio Cisneros3452% gamesnot enough data
Rocio Molina + Bianca Loya224 matchesnot enough data
Victor Tapia + Mauricio Cisneros134 matchesnot enough data
Mauricio Cisneros + Yvana Sanchez314 matchesnot enough data
Omar Abbud + Armando Landa303 matchesnot enough data
Armando Landa + Brianna Barreiro213 matchesnot enough data
Mauricio Cisneros + Marcelle Fernandez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Armando Landa
41W–23L career · 18 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.98
4.5
Gabriel Alvarez
0W–10L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
3.86
4
Andre Martinez
15W–9L career · 15 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Bianca Loya
42W–32L career · 11 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Brianna Barreiro
43W–6L career · 25 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.59
3.5
Hector Montalvo
29W–10L career · 35 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.59
Juan Pablo Becerra
20W–6L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Katherine Haycraft
25W–10L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marcelle Fernandez
24W–10L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mauricio Cisneros
74W–71L career · 39 lines in 2026
not enough data
Monica Montalvo
16W–4L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Omar Abbud
56W–26L career · 25 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paulina Caraveo
17W–16L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rocio Molina
78W–48L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Victor Tapia
16W–16L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Yvana Sanchez
42W–17L career · 26 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.