Teams

Mentken's Maurader's

2024 Adult 40 & Over - NAZ · NAZ 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTHERN ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-04vs NAZ/Weber/40 and over/4.0MWon 31
W#1 DoublesAndy Mraz / Matthew Mraz vs Mark Navarro / Kirk Westervelt6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTrent Bowers vs Jeffrey Hovermill3-0
W#2 DoublesLuke Thesing / Jeff Champ vs Cliff Gerwick / Warren Cassatt2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMike Poling / Charles Mentken vs Stephen Lakowske / Timothy Cox6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-11-04vs NAZ/Weber/40 and over/4.0MWon 31
W#1 DoublesAndy Mraz / Matthew Mraz vs Mark Navarro / Timothy Weber6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMike Poling vs Timothy Cox4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBilly Bilbray / Luke Thesing vs Cliff Gerwick / Warren Cassatt6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTrent Bowers / Frank Coe vs Ron Franklin / Stephen Lakowske7-5, 6-4
2023-09-30vs Team IwaiWon 31
W#1 DoublesAndy Mraz / Matthew Mraz vs Keiji Iwai / John Malone6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCharles Mentken vs David Kumasaka6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDan Salcito / Jeff Champ vs Robert Voytek / Steven Riggs4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTrent Bowers / Frank Coe vs Steve Schulz / Bruce Bourne6-4, 6-3
2023-09-30vs Team IwaiSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBilly Bilbray / Charles Mentken vs John Malone / Steve Schulz3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesTrent Bowers vs Keiji Iwai6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDan Salcito / Frank Coe vs Bruce Bourne / Robert Voytek1-3
W#3 DoublesAndy Mraz / Matthew Mraz vs David Kumasaka / Rich Stephens6-2, 6-1
2023-09-23vs NAZ/Weber/40 and over/4.0MLost 13
W#1 DoublesAndy Mraz / Matthew Mraz vs Robert Sellani / Mark Navarro6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCharles Mentken vs Feng Yang4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDan Salcito / Luke Thesing vs Gary Linden / Mark Carlson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeff Champ / Mike Poling vs Timothy Weber / Warren Cassatt6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-09-23vs NAZ/Weber/40 and over/4.0MLost 13
W#1 DoublesAndy Mraz / Matthew Mraz vs Cliff Gerwick / Kirk Westervelt4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMike Poling vs Mark Navarro2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDan Salcito / Luke Thesing vs Timothy Weber / Peter Ney2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCharles Mentken / Jeff Champ vs Feng Yang / Jachee Tseng2-6, 2-6
2023-09-02vs Team IwaiLost 13
L#1 DoublesAndy Mraz / Matthew Mraz vs Keiji Iwai / John Malone4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTrent Bowers vs Bryan Gest3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCharles Mentken / Jeff Champ vs David Kumasaka / Rich Stephens6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDan Salcito / Luke Thesing vs Steven Riggs / Steve Schulz2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-02vs Team IwaiLost 13
L#1 DoublesDan Salcito / Luke Thesing vs Rich Stephens / Bryan Gest1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMike Poling vs John Malone3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAndy Mraz / Matthew Mraz vs Keiji Iwai / David Kumasaka6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesFrank Coe / Billy Bilbray vs Robert Voytek / Bruce Bourne2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · NAZ 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NAZ/Weber/40 and over/4.0M62201230261
2Mentken's Maurader's44151738295
3Team Iwai26131942300

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Billy Bilbray
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Matthew Mraz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
3.66
Andy Mraz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.46
Jeff Champ
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.45
Frank Coe
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.35
Charles Mentken
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Dan Salcito
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
Luke Thesing
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Mike Poling
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Trent Bowers
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Mraz + Andy Mraz30460% games+21.0% vs expected
Billy Bilbray + Jeff Champ5067% gamesnot enough data
Dan Salcito + Luke Thesing134 matchesnot enough data
Charles Mentken + Jeff Champ224 matchesnot enough data
Luke Thesing + Jeff Champ213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Billy Bilbray
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Matthew Mraz
39W–6L career · 8 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Andy Mraz
47W–8L career · 8 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
Jeff Champ
30W–24L career · 5 lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.46
Frank Coe
15W–12L career · 4 lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.45
3.5
Charles Mentken
7W–13L career · type S · 6 lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.35
4
Dan Salcito
13W–22L career · 6 lines in 2024
95%5%<1%
3.27
Luke Thesing
17W–6L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mike Poling
3W–6L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Trent Bowers
11W–1L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.