Teams

Sunrise/DeLaRosa

2026 Broward TriLevel · 4.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 7 7:30 PM
Alberto de la Rosa
Sep 14 7:00 PM
Brian PiccoloTennis Center
2026-08-31vs Piccolo/PerillaLost 01
L#3 DoublesJuan Andres Gomez de la Vega Peredo / Oliver Matheus vs Jonnattan Diaz / Lester Suarez6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2026-07-20vs Midtown/RodriguezWon 21
W#1 DoublesLuis Soto / Daniel Delgado vs Lee Neidorf / Luis Moreno6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJorge Balsamo / Simon Palacios vs Alan Benarroch / Robert Gregory3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDorian Pieters / Ricardo Ramirez vs John Hingley / Jose Li6-2, 6-3
2026-07-13vs Midtown/PradoWon 21
W#1 DoublesLuis Soto / Daniel Delgado vs Daniel Oropeza / Pedro Ramirez7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJorge Balsamo / Carlos Diaz vs Enrique Bonifaz / ALEJANDRO PERNIAS4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesRicardo Ramirez / Dorian Pieters vs Aldri Franco / Mario Noriega6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sunrise/DeLaRosa2042450
2Midtown/Prado1133653
3Midtown/Rodriguez1133754
4Piccolo/Perilla0224970

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Luis Soto
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.38
Daniel Delgado
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.35
Inigo Ojer
published
4.00
Simon Palacios
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Dorian Pieters
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.71
Jorge Balsamo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
3.33
Juan Andres Gomez de la Vega Peredo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Oliver Matheus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jorge Balsamo + Simon Palacios12458% games+5.6% vs expected
Luis Soto + Daniel Delgado213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luis Soto
21W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
4.41
4.5
Daniel Delgado
12W–6L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
4.38
Inigo Ojer
7W–4L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%14%
4.35
4
Simon Palacios
263W–139L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.00
3.5
Dorian Pieters
65W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.72
4
Jorge Balsamo
180W–109L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Alberto de la Rosa
4W–13L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
Juan Andres Gomez de la Vega Peredo
22W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
Oliver Matheus
7W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.