Teams

MTC-Sander

2022 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-03-13vs WW-RacelisLost 01
L#3 DoublesPeggy McElgunn / Sean McElgunn vs Jennifer White / Yancey Jones1-6, 2-6
2022-02-27vs SAL-LaneLost 01
L#3 DoublesLewis Farinholt / Susan Zielinski vs Scott Gordon / Melissa Brunner-Brown4-6, 5-4, 1-0
2022-02-06vs BURK-ShulerLost 01
L#3 DoublesSean McElgunn / Peggy McElgunn vs Mark Moore / Lynne Moore3-6, 4-6
2022-01-30vs MAC-WhiteLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichael Sander / Susan Zielinski vs Douglas Rosenberg / Deirdre Vaughan2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Peggy McElgunn
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Jamie Stokes
published 3.5
3.18
Monica Bhardwaj
published
3.15
Tracy Marks
published
3.12
Robin Meyer
published
3.09
Manohar Viswanathan
published
3.09
Susan Zielinski
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Lewis Farinholt
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Peggy McElgunn
144W–170L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Jamie Stokes
18W–10L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Monica Bhardwaj
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
Tracy Marks
12W–16L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.15
Robin Meyer
15W–23L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Manohar Viswanathan
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Susan Zielinski
125W–157L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Lewis Farinholt
3W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.