Teams

YTC-DeGrasse

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 MEN

10 players · average NTRP 4.07 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-04-18vs PC-LauckWon 31
L#1 DoublesKhalid Benedicto / Richard Lozano vs Lee Colclasure / John Kowatsch3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesKay To vs John Lauck6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJonathan Whiteside / Timothy Miller vs David Haight / Michael Cabasug0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNate Fulton / Ross Austin vs Ryan LaPlante / David Sarbacher7-6, 6-4
2021-04-18vs PC-The Good Luck ChucksWon 21
W#1 DoublesRichard Lozano / Khalid Benedicto vs Vincent Beasley / Cory Brooks6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJames Degrasse / Jonathan Whiteside vs Derek Harmon / Marc Spinner6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesRyan Chan / Kay To vs Eldon Monson / Emerson Clark6-3, 6-0
2021-04-17vs CBRC-SamuelLost 13
L#1 DoublesJonathan Whiteside / Timothy Miller vs Adam Hrebeniuk / Todd Samuel2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNate Fulton / Ross Austin vs Scott Dowson / Jim Perry0-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesDan Plath vs Sheng-Lun Tai2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKay To / Ryan Chan vs John Sands / Nikolla Qafoku6-0, 6-2
2021-04-17vs GAC-AnslingerWon 31
W#1 DoublesRichard Lozano / James Degrasse vs Wes Haynes / Scott Stephen6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJonathan Whiteside vs Alejandro Chavarria1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesRyan Chan / Kay To vs Dan Ferguson / Adam Hutchinson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDan Plath / Mark Schaake vs Erick Reyes / Adam Rahmlow6-1, 6-4
2021-04-16vs SC-AndersonWon 40
W#1 DoublesJonathan Whiteside / Timothy Miller vs Tim Qualls / Glen Satre7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNate Fulton / Ross Austin vs Guy Schneider / Rahul Sharma6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKay To vs Keith Schmidt6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDan Plath / Mark Schaake vs Kim Greer / Steve Greer7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jonathan Lai
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 4.5
4.03
Nate Fulton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.86
Ryan Chan
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.84
Dan Plath
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.76
Mark Schaake
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Kay To
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.68
Richard Lozano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
James Degrasse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Jonathan Whiteside
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Ross Austin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Plath + Mark Schaake61347% games−4.1% vs expected
Richard Lozano + James Degrasse41340% games−12.3% vs expected
Kay To + Ryan Chan4170% gamesnot enough data
Nate Fulton + Dan Plath314 matchesnot enough data
Jonathan Whiteside + James Degrasse224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jonathan Lai
80W–50L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nate Fulton
39W–10L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Ryan Chan
96W–56L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Dan Plath
56W–48L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Mark Schaake
16W–29L career · type S · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Kay To
44W–28L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Richard Lozano
92W–93L career · 3 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.68
4
James Degrasse
34W–82L career · 2 lines in 2021
65%35%<1%
3.45
Jonathan Whiteside
25W–27L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Ross Austin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.