Teams

GSTL40/Trask/Grande Dunes

2025 Combo 40 & Over- GSTL · Adult WOMEN - 7.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-11vs GSTL40/Smith/PrestwickWon 10
W#2 DoublesSherri Meyers / Diana Morgan vs Patti Conrad / Lucy OHare6-1, 6-3
2025-09-10vs GSTL40/Bass/DunesWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnna Kirby / Diana Morgan vs Celeste Jackson / Sonya Martin6-3, 6-3
2025-09-03vs GSTL40/Smith/PrestwickLost 01
L#1 DoublesSherri Meyers / Diana Morgan vs Catherine Hill / Michele Singleton7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-08-27vs GSTL40/Pavy /PrestwickLost 01
L#1 DoublesBonnie Trask / Diana Morgan vs Allison DeVaux / Kristy Stocks4-6, 4-6
2025-08-21vs GSTL40/Bass/DunesWon 10
W#3 DoublesDeanne Johnson Stephens / Diana Morgan vs Myla Butler / Becky Walls6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult WOMEN - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Sherri Meyers
published
3.76
Sue Broderick
published
3.61
Anna Kirby
published 4
3.45
Gayle Berkey
published 4
3.40
Bonnie Trask
published 4
3.33
Karen Swartling
published
3.27
Sandra Valentine
published
3.09
Diana Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.98
Erica Guyton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Staci Bellamy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deanne Johnson Stephens + Sue Broderick7458% games+14.7% vs expected
Bonnie Trask + Sherri Meyers5258% games+5.1% vs expected
Sue Broderick + Sherri Meyers314 matchesnot enough data
Deanne Johnson Stephens + Karen Swartling303 matchesnot enough data
Deanne Johnson Stephens + Bonnie Trask213 matchesnot enough data
Karen Swartling + Anna Kirby213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sherri Meyers
43W–31L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
Sue Broderick
149W–98L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Anna Kirby
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Deanne Johnson Stephens
19W–11L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Gayle Berkey
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
4
Bonnie Trask
15W–13L career · no lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
Karen Swartling
20W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Sandra Valentine
22W–19L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Diana Morgan
53W–74L career · 10 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Erica Guyton
19W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Staci Bellamy
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.