Teams

SS-LT PINK

2025 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-03vs PRC GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesSara Percival / Rebecca Dalzell vs Jackie Smith / Amber Harris4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSheila Marino vs Emily Carter2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTara Crockett / Ingrid Burke vs Lori Lee / Celeste Gardner3-6, 2-6
2025-04-26vs HFII YELLOWWon 21
L#1 DoublesSheila Beurket / Tara Crockett vs Michelle Johnson / Virginia Foster2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMadison Irvine vs Laura Moche6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesIngrid Burke / Sara Percival vs Dana McHale / Kelly Peecher6-3, 7-6
2025-04-19vs PRKR REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesSheila Marino / Sara Percival vs Betsy Tapp / Lorri Basile6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMadison Irvine vs Shawna Allen6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKelly Katsnelson / Rebecca Dalzell vs Alyssa Shaw / Laurie Lehmann4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-04-12vs PRKR ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesSara Percival / Madison Irvine vs Robin Mortenson / Andrea Vickers6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesTara Crockett vs Kristen Warnick4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSheila Beurket / Kelly Katsnelson vs Shannon Fronapfel / Susan Goldman6-3, 6-4
2025-04-10vs HRCA-N NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesTara Crockett / Rebecca Dalzell vs Marie O'Neill / Cortney Eisses3-6, 7-5
W#1 SinglesMadison Irvine vs Sheila Baker6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSheila Marino / Ingrid Burke vs Alison Cargo / Lydia Sfeir5-7, 5-7
2025-04-07vs SS-H BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesIngrid Burke / Rebecca Dalzell vs Nancy Carlson / Becky Lowery4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSheila Beurket vs Jennifer DeLurgio4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSara Percival / Sheila Marino vs Kathy Reiner / Sudy Opsahl6-1, 6-4
2025-03-26vs WC GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesSheila Beurket / Tara Crockett vs Laura Ream / Laura Kemper6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSara Percival vs Lisa Nelson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesIngrid Burke / Rebecca Dalzell vs SUSAN MORAVEK / Caitlin Buckingham7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LTC-M YELLOW6014415162
2HRCA-N NAVY6115616169
3WP-C RED5215615154
4GAC TEAL5213819154
5SS-LT PINK5213820188
6SS-HP PINK4312918165
7HRCA-N YELLOW4312921165
8RCC PURPLE4312921169
9HFII NAVY43101127210
10VC NAVY34111022174
11HFII YELLOW34111023174
12PTC GOLD2571429201
13PRKR RED2581330218
14RMTC PINK1651633211
15SS-HP NAVY1641735236

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Madison Irvine
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.93
Sara Percival
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Sheila Marino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Tara Crockett
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.74
Rebecca Dalzell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.66
Ingrid Burke
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.53
Sheila Beurket
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.49
Kelly Katsnelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Dalzell + Tara Crockett5255% games+5.3% vs expected
Rebecca Dalzell + Ingrid Burke7452% games+1.5% vs expected
Ingrid Burke + Sheila Marino1447% games+1.2% vs expected
Sara Percival + Sheila Marino9556% games−1.8% vs expected
Kelly Katsnelson + Rebecca Dalzell9556% games−5.7% vs expected
Ingrid Burke + Tara Crockett2348% games−6.0% vs expected
Sheila Beurket + Tara Crockett3248% gamesnot enough data
Sara Percival + Rebecca Dalzell224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Madison Irvine
38W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Sara Percival
73W–51L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Sheila Marino
55W–56L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.80
Tara Crockett
22W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Rebecca Dalzell
106W–65L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
Ingrid Burke
18W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Sheila Beurket
9W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
3
Kelly Katsnelson
43W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.