Teams

Goings/18/3.5/WN/LSU

2023 City Championship 18 & Over - Women Night · 3.5 (18&O) Women Night

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5 (18&O) Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hottes/18/3.5/WN/BREC100391129334
2Jaureguy/18/3.5/WN/BREC91401026327
3Bordlee/18/3.5/WN/BREC64242660469
4Neames/18/3.5/WN/CCL46242658460
5Jenkins/18/3.5/WN/BREC46212961469
6Goings/18/3.5/WN/LSU37183269485
7Wismans/18/3.5/WN/LSU37193172491
8Scalise/18/3.5/WN/Bocage19153575524

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Brandi Faulk
published 3.5
3.28
Sheri Goings
published
3.27
Onam Bisht
published
3.26
Dawn Thibodeaux
published 3.5
3.11
Suzanne Wortmann
published
3.07
Lilibeth Pongyan
published
3.06
Jennifer Dietz
published
3.01
Karen Doty
published
2.98
Kyle Barker
published
2.88
2.84
Margaret Burleigh
published
Jody Emonet
published
Lise Sperling
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Wortmann + Lilibeth Pongyan4252% games+11.2% vs expected
Lilibeth Pongyan + Onam Bisht2447% games+2.5% vs expected
Christine McKegney + Margaret Burleigh1733% games−20.3% vs expected
Lilibeth Pongyan + Kyle Barker1439% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Thibodeaux + Brandi Faulk033 matchesnot enough data
Lise Sperling + Christine McKegney033 matchesnot enough data
Lise Sperling + Lilibeth Pongyan033 matchesnot enough data
Christine McKegney + Suzanne Wortmann033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brandi Faulk
26W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
Sheri Goings
19W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
Onam Bisht
45W–50L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Dawn Thibodeaux
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
Suzanne Wortmann
36W–54L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
Lilibeth Pongyan
23W–47L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Jennifer Dietz
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Karen Doty
10W–26L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
Kyle Barker
18W–55L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Christine McKegney
21W–42L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.88
Margaret Burleigh
32W–50L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
Jody Emonet
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lise Sperling
8W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.