Teams

SGV Wild Cards-Tang-Arroyo High /SU2/10

2026 Tri-Level League - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.12 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesJames Mason / Hoa Do vs Jermaine Montgomery / Clay Tweel6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChen-Jun Huang / Daniel Kanemoto vs Manoj Parmar / Woo Kim3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBilly Han / Philman Tjong vs John Bragg / Andy Baker7-5, 6-4
2026-08-09vs SGV Trouble Makers-Kan-WN/SU8Won 20
W#1 DoublesBrian Su / Aaron Nepomuceno vs Jesse Huang / Christopher Nguy6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesVincent Nguyen / Chen-Jun Huang vs Tam Vo / Gerardo Emanuel Koropesky6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · SGV - Men 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SGV Wild Cards-Tang-Arroyo High /SU2/103081355
2SGV Tennis Addicts-James Lee-Arroyo HS/Su821451182
3SGV HDP-Villarino-Palm Park/SU10225714118
4SGV Tennis Addictzz-JW.Kim-Arroyo HS/SA1212541082
5SGV Noobies-R. Lee-San Marino High/SA1012451288
6SGV Trouble Makers-Kan-WN/SU802151073

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
AUSTIN HARVILL
published 4.5
4.46
Aaron Nepomuceno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.38
Brian Su
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.33
Kaden Salvador
published
4.22
Colin Tang
published 4
4.16
Hoa Do
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Chen-Jun Huang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Daniel Kanemoto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Anthony Lim
published 4
3.40
Philman Tjong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Billy Han
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Noel Nepomuceno
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jongjin Lee
published
Mac Katkavich
published
Vincent Nguyen
published
Yoshiki Hisamoto
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
AUSTIN HARVILL
21W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
4.52
4.5
Aaron Nepomuceno
13W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%61%39%
4.46
4.5
Brian Su
8W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
4.38
Kaden Salvador
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%12%
4.33
4
Colin Tang
17W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
4.22
Hoa Do
23W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
4.16
4
Chen-Jun Huang
24W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Daniel Kanemoto
22W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Anthony Lim
8W–0L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
Philman Tjong
10W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Billy Han
7W–3L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
Noel Nepomuceno
18W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.31
Jongjin Lee
8W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mac Katkavich
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Vincent Nguyen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Yoshiki Hisamoto
5W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.