Teams

Piedmont Park (David Waterbury)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Men - Low · 4.0 Low (Check Eligibility List) - Zach Moore

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-01-13vs Bitsy Grant (DShawn Murphy)*Lost 04
L#1 DoublesTim Kovacs / Connor Smith vs Anthony Bennett / Robert Bryan1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRette Rankin / David Waterbury vs Gabriel Buddenbrock / Dale Davis3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesDavid Fletcher vs Brian Taylor7-5, 3-6, 1-2
L#3 DoublesMatthew Ritz / Randy Baker vs Antoine Alston / Christopher Riley2-6, 3-6
2024-01-02vs Glenlake (Thanh Doan)*Split 22
W#1 DoublesAaron Walter / Arvind Reddy vs Arnie Ahn / Visut Kromadit7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDavid Waterbury / Connor Smith vs Joe Schleupner / Tejas Santanam7-6, 6-3
L#2 SinglesDavid Fletcher vs ROBERT RUBIN6-3, 5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Ritz / Rette Rankin vs Brian Lazaro / Slater Burke3-6, 2-6
2023-11-18vs Bitsy Grant (DShawn Murphy)*Lost 23
W#1 DoublesJacob Franklin / Tim Kovacs vs Antoine Alston / Nishant Jain6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDavid Fletcher vs DShawn Murphy1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAaron Walter / Connor Smith vs Dale Davis / Brian Taylor3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJohn Andersen vs Vishwas Sinha6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRandy Baker / Matthew Ritz vs John McPhillips / Chad Hagan6-3, 1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Low (Check Eligibility List) - Zach Moore have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Hector Vera
published 4
3.67
David Waterbury
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Tim Kovacs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
David Fletcher
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.44
Rick Baker
published
3.36
Connor Smith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.31
Aaron Walter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Colin Huong
published 3.5
3.20
Erik Day
published 3.5
3.08
Dan Kester
published 3.5
3.00
John Andersen
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Matthew Ritz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Randy Baker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rette Rankin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Waterbury + Tim Kovacs4161% gamesnot enough data
Randy Baker + Matthew Ritz134 matchesnot enough data
David Waterbury + David Fletcher224 matchesnot enough data
Colin Huong + Aaron Walter224 matchesnot enough data
Randy Baker + Erik Day213 matchesnot enough data
Colin Huong + Dan Kester213 matchesnot enough data
Rette Rankin + Aaron Walter123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hector Vera
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
David Waterbury
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
Tim Kovacs
18W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
David Fletcher
7W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
Rick Baker
10W–12L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
3.44
4
Connor Smith
11W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
86%14%<1%
3.36
3.5
Aaron Walter
21W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Colin Huong
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Erik Day
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Dan Kester
11W–16L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
John Andersen
11W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
Matthew Ritz
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Randy Baker
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rette Rankin
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.