Teams

OSRC:Jumping off the Bridge:Noniewicz

2024 ECT Tri Level · 3.5 Men 1

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-11vs GF:Tri:FasuloWon 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Noniewicz / Craig Cooke vs Mihai Alex Stoian / Rob Musto7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2024-11-09vs GF:Tri:FasuloLost 01
L#1 DoublesCraig Cooke / Paul Noniewicz vs Kevin Sullivan / Daniel Fasulo7-6, 5-7
2024-10-08vs GF:Tri:FasuloWon 10
W#1 DoublesThomas Noniewicz / Paul Noniewicz vs Mihai Alex Stoian / Kevin Sullivan6-4, 6-4
2024-09-29vs GF:Tri:FasuloLost 01
L#1 DoublesCraig Cooke / Thomas Noniewicz vs Daniel Fasulo / Rob Musto1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-09-23vs GF:Tri:FasuloWon 10
W#1 DoublesThomas Noniewicz / Paul Noniewicz vs Daniel Fasulo / Kevin Sullivan6-3, 6-2
2024-09-15vs GF:Tri:FasuloLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Bubello / Craig Cooke vs Rob Musto / Mihai Alex Stoian7-5, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OSRC:Jumping off the Bridge:Noniewicz0632659
2GF:Tri:Fasulo0623964

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Craig Cooke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Paul Noniewicz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
John Bubello
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Thomas Noniewicz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Noniewicz + Thomas Noniewicz16755% games+8.5% vs expected
Paul Noniewicz + Craig Cooke11357% games+5.4% vs expected
Craig Cooke + Thomas Noniewicz314 matchesnot enough data
Craig Cooke + John Bubello134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Craig Cooke
53W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.42
Paul Noniewicz
114W–55L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33
John Bubello
14W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Thomas Noniewicz
69W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.