Teams

Murray Hill

2026 18&over Women Day Fall · 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-01-15vs Dream TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Meenan / Carol Soos vs Sinead Bennett / Andrea Kayyali6-7, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCollette Warren vs Patricia Hsu6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Baird / Elizabeth Clark vs Vivian Xiaocheng Li / Niki Chen6-4, 7-5
2025-10-09vs Dream TeamSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCarol Soos / Corinne Thomas vs Britt Ryan / Sinead Bennett6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristen Segal vs Patricia Hsu4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Baird / Elizabeth Clark vs Meghan Mediratta / Thu Thai1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJessica Mills / Collette Warren vs Isabel Mendelsohn / Victoria May6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carol Soos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Corinne Thomas
published 4
Elizabeth Meenan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Elizabeth Clark
published 3.5
3.13
Nora Heitmann
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published
Collette Warren
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Kate Hunzinger
published
Kristen Segal
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Lisa Baird
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Paige Guest
published
Sara Reeder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Reeder + Carol Soos7456% games+13.5% vs expected
Carol Soos + Corinne Thomas10652% games+1.8% vs expected
Elizabeth Meenan + Kate Hunzinger101150% games+1.2% vs expected
Carol Soos + Elizabeth Meenan3348% games−1.7% vs expected
Carol Soos + Lisa Baird1536% games−4.4% vs expected
Sara Reeder + Lisa Baird1537% gamesnot enough data
Nora Heitmann + Sara Reeder2346% gamesnot enough data
Sara Reeder + Corinne Thomas4155% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carol Soos
39W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Corinne Thomas
27W–19L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Courtney Santarelli
9W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Elizabeth Meenan
30W–39L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Clark
19W–23L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nora Heitmann
46W–57L career · 11 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.13
Collette Warren
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kate Hunzinger
30W–40L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Katherin Nukk-Freeman
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristen Segal
22W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Baird
19W–62L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paige Guest
7W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sara Reeder
53W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.