Teams

CP RED

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.36 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-31vs MC BLACKWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Topf / Teresa Crane vs Margaret Harwood / Denise Belk0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLAUREN MATTINGLY vs Kristin Danford6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Reimann / Alison Tweedie vs Karen Greenwood / Karen Payne6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-05-24vs BP REDLost 23
L#1 DoublesTeresa Crane / Heather Reimann vs Julie Clapham / Talia Cioth6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKimberly Gillock vs Christi Valicenti0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCaitlin Finn / Kate Strecker vs Andrea Philleo / Yukiko Brooks6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesLAUREN MATTINGLY vs Madison Fortunato6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesShannon McKay / Diane Schayes vs Denise Hernandez / Kristen Ryan4-6, 4-6
2022-05-17vs JCC NAVYLost 13
L#1 DoublesCaitlin Finn / Kate Strecker vs Clare Morey / Julie Lang7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLAUREN MATTINGLY vs Jenny Loeff2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLauren Perry / Irene Mendelsberg vs Claire Douthit / Juana Donald6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesHeather Reimann / Diane Schayes vs Susan Conway / Elise Wood2-6, 3-6
2022-05-10vs GTC REDLost 14
L#1 DoublesTeresa Crane / Heather Reimann vs Erica Bramlet / Heidi Halus6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLAUREN MATTINGLY vs Lindsey Zerbinos4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCaitlin Finn / Kate Strecker vs Catherine Safieddine / Tonya Laden2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKimberly Gillock vs Michelle Degitis1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Topf / Lauren Perry vs Heather Ringelman / KC Nettleton6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-03vs RHCC REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesTeresa Crane / Heather Reimann vs Jenna Marvin / Shellie Hall6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKimberly Gillock vs Elisa Dannemiller6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLauren Perry / Irene Mendelsberg vs Orit Ostrowiak / Michelle Phenicie6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlison Tweedie / Michelle Topf vs Martha Williams / Anne Torkelson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-26vs MC BLACKLost 23
L#1 DoublesCaitlin Finn / Michelle Topf vs Kristin Danford / Robin Behrstock1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLAUREN MATTINGLY vs Cyndy Besselievre7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesIrene Mendelsberg / Heather Reimann vs Margaret Harwood / Denise Belk2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLauren Perry vs Kim Grogan6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDiane Schayes / Alison Tweedie vs Karen Greenwood / Tina Francis3-6, 3-6
2022-04-19vs BP REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesIrene Mendelsberg / Teresa Crane vs Charlotte Rhoad / Christi Valicenti6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLAUREN MATTINGLY vs Kristen Ryan6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCaitlin Finn / Kate Strecker vs Julie Clapham / Yukiko Brooks4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHeather Reimann / Michelle Topf vs Denise Hernandez / Rosemary Garcia6-3, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Irene Mendelsberg
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.29
Heather Reimann
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.28
Caitlin Finn
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.28
Kate Strecker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.10
Lauren Perry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
4.04
Michelle Topf
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.87
Kimberly Gillock
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
Alison Tweedie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Diane Schayes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
LAUREN MATTINGLY
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
Teresa Crane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Perry + Irene Mendelsberg291158% games+4.7% vs expected
Caitlin Finn + Kate Strecker7753% games−0.5% vs expected
Caitlin Finn + Michelle Topf21041% games−8.1% vs expected
Lauren Perry + Michelle Topf314 matchesnot enough data
Heather Reimann + Michelle Topf404 matchesnot enough data
Alison Tweedie + Heather Reimann123 matchesnot enough data
Heather Reimann + Teresa Crane123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Irene Mendelsberg
67W–40L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Heather Reimann
61W–93L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Caitlin Finn
30W–26L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Kate Strecker
22W–20L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.28
Lauren Perry
89W–38L career · 4 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Michelle Topf
53W–65L career · 5 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
4.04
4
Kimberly Gillock
66W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Alison Tweedie
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Diane Schayes
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
LAUREN MATTINGLY
11W–4L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Teresa Crane
29W–15L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.