Teams

Fee - Dheere

2025 Brevard Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-15vs Kiwi - MurphyLost 02
L#1 DoublesCary Broome / Susan Delp vs Chad Shoultz / Anne Ramsey1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJim Hebert / Carolyn Hampton vs Tina Murphy / Sean Murphy0-6, 0-6
2025-06-17vs EFSC - SimmonsWon 10
W#2 DoublesJessica Vega Coots / James Coots vs Mathew Deater / Courtney Thomassen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-14vs Viera Regional Park - HeltonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJessica Vega Coots / James Coots vs Elizabeth Shannon / WILLIAM WOOD7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2025-06-10vs Kiwi - MurphyLost 01
L#2 DoublesJessica Vega Coots / James Coots vs Kimberly Farson / Shane Baker7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-07vs RCCB - HeynWon 10
W#2 DoublesJessica Vega Coots / James Coots vs Louis Heyn / Michele Heyn6-4, 7-6
2025-05-20vs Brevard/Hopkins/Mixed18&Over7.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJessica Vega Coots / James Coots vs Joel Hopkins / Monica Hammer0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Jessica Vega Coots
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.52
Doug Walker
published
3.36
Sandee Reich
published
3.36
Steve Brako
published
Carolyn Hampton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
James Coots
published
3.11
Jessica Dheere
published
2.73
Cary Broome
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jim Hebert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Delp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Delp + Cary Broome1443% gamesnot enough data
Jessica Vega Coots + James Coots4152% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jessica Vega Coots
90W–40L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.75
Doug Walker
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Sandee Reich
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.36
Steve Brako
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Carolyn Hampton
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
James Coots
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Jessica Dheere
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.11
3
Cary Broome
1W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Jim Hebert
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Delp
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.