Teams

CCOC BOOK

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-05vs FLYHS COUTURELost 01
L#2 DoublesCrista Clancy / Jan Hyman vs Sheri Ford / MARY HALABY2-6, 3-6
2024-08-29vs CCW YOUNGLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Simmons / Mary Vanryzin vs Kim Young / Lori Littleford4-6, 4-6
2024-08-22vs LTFCS MUELLERLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelsey Hunt / Mary Vanryzin vs Amy Obenchain / Shannon McCrary2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCrista Clancy / Jan Hyman vs Allison Flannery / Jean Mueller1-6, 2-6
2024-08-15vs MEMPK MARKLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Simmons / Mary Vanryzin vs Reta McKee / Carol Presicci2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-08-06vs CSRC MCCABELost 01
L#2 DoublesJan Hyman / Suzanne Book vs Christi Andress / DARLENE WARMOUTH2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Colleen Cameron
published 3.5
3.27
Tracy Coons
published
3.25
Mary Vanryzin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Mary Simmons
published
3.22
Kelsey Hunt
published
3.12
Janet Luce
published
2.62
Jan Hyman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Crista Clancy
published 3
Maura Houston
published
Suzanne Book
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Coons + Kelsey Hunt4158% games+9.1% vs expected
Mary Simmons + Mary Vanryzin213 matchesnot enough data
Mary Simmons + Kelsey Hunt123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Vanryzin + Tracy Coons213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Colleen Cameron
5W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.40
Tracy Coons
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Mary Vanryzin
50W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Mary Simmons
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Kelsey Hunt
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Janet Luce
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Jan Hyman
66W–86L career · 3 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Crista Clancy
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.62
Maura Houston
37W–26L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Suzanne Book
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.