Teams

Wilkinson/Memphis

2025 Adult 40 & Over-Memphis · 4.0 Women 40 & over

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-03vs Bratton/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeslie Wilkinson / Courtney Wright vs Julie Parks / Trisha Dooley0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Fortenberry / Karen Kassen vs Nancy Goodwin / Anne Higgins1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesRachel Reddin / Rebecca Fitschen vs Melony Bratton / Michele Smith6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-04-29vs Monistere/MemphisWon 31
W#1 DoublesLeslie Wilkinson / Lindsay Adams vs Tina Schneiderman / Shannon Peterson6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCourtney Wright / Virginia Williams vs Brooke Robinson / Catherine Eddy6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesArlie Hanigan-Walters / Kelley Smith vs Beth Halbach / Diane Brower7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#4 DoublesLaura Fortenberry / Karen Kassen vs Alison Drago / Dawn Ton7-5, 6-3
2025-04-12vs Davis/MemphisLost 23
L#1 DoublesRachel Reddin / Rebecca Fitschen vs Lynn Davis / Andrea Henry4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLeslie Wilkinson vs Cristy Buziak7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Smith / Courtney Wright vs Stacey Hyde / Laura Hollis-Talley0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKelley Smith / Lindsay Adams vs Jennifer Wright / Claire Fowler4-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesTonia Gardner / Elizabeth Gilless vs Ally Boggan / Carol Casey6-2, 7-5
2025-03-29vs Bratton/MemphisWon 32
W#1 DoublesAna Yambrek / Kristi McCrory vs Donna Coffman / Kimberly Mitchell7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRachel Reddin vs Trisha Dooley6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAudrey Thieffry / Laura Fortenberry vs Nancy Goodwin / Julie Parks2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLeslie Wilkinson / Kiersten Schnacke vs Gayla Arvin / Mandy Rude6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#4 DoublesRachel Baker / Rebecca Fitschen vs Michele Smith / Ashley Burns4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-03-22vs Monistere/MemphisWon 32
W#1 DoublesRachel Baker / Audrey Thieffry vs Beth Halbach / Diane Brower6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRachel Reddin vs Jessica Flesch6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPalmer Burt / Courtney Wright vs Tina Schneiderman / Catherine Eddy6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKiersten Schnacke / Gina Smith vs Robin Thomas / Brooke Robinson6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#4 DoublesKaren Kassen / Virginia Williams vs Jennifer OConnell / Dawn Ton3-6, 3-6
2025-03-08vs Davis/MemphisLost 05
L#1 DoublesRachel Baker / Gina Smith vs Darlene Loprete / Carol Casey5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKiersten Schnacke vs Cristy Buziak6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesArlie Hanigan-Walters / Courtney Wright vs Stacey Hyde / Laura Hollis-Talley2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRachel Reddin / Rebecca Fitschen vs Ally Boggan / Claire Fowler4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesKelley Smith / Lindsay Adams vs Andrea Henry / Gloria Hicks6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women 40 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Ana Yambrek
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.67
Audrey Thieffry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Leslie Wilkinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.63
Rachel Baker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Elizabeth Gilless
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Palmer Burt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Arlie Hanigan-Walters
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.43
Kiersten Schnacke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.42
Laura Fortenberry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Lindsay Adams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.35
Tonia Gardner
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Rachel Reddin
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.23
Rebecca Fitschen
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Kelley Smith
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
3.10
Courtney Wright
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.79
Karen Kassen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
Kristi McCrory
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Gilless + Tonia Gardner5451% games+5.9% vs expected
Leslie Wilkinson + Kiersten Schnacke224 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Reddin + Rebecca Fitschen123 matchesnot enough data
Kelley Smith + Courtney Wright213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ana Yambrek
14W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.95
4
Audrey Thieffry
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.67
Leslie Wilkinson
17W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
Rachel Baker
16W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Elizabeth Gilless
17W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Palmer Burt
11W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
4
Arlie Hanigan-Walters
10W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
Kiersten Schnacke
50W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Laura Fortenberry
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.42
Lindsay Adams
22W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Tonia Gardner
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.35
Rachel Reddin
20W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Rebecca Fitschen
11W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kelley Smith
13W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Courtney Wright
23W–16L career · 8 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Karen Kassen
4W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.79
Kristi McCrory
13W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.