Teams

Hills/Patrick/50&Over8.5W

2024 Hillsborough Combo 50 & Over · 8.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.15 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-10vs Hills/Armagost/50&Over8.5WWon 20
W#2 DoublesKaren MacCormack / Tania Biller vs Kelly Armagost / Anne-Lucie Bouchard6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKristie Bryan / Julie Martin vs Angela Bowes / Karen Abrams6-1, 6-0
2024-11-03vs Hills/Armagost/50&Over8.5WWon 20
W#1 DoublesTania Biller / Sonia Patrick vs Anne-Lucie Bouchard / Jenny Hughes6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMargaret Roset / Darlene Sparks vs Katie Healy / Leticia Leppert6-3, 6-3
2024-10-27vs Hills/Armagost/50&Over8.5WSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRebecca Evangelista / Karen MacCormack vs Lara Slatniske / Dianne Albina3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKristie Bryan / Julie Martin vs Christina Dorothy / Karen Abrams7-6, 6-1
2024-09-29vs Hills/Armagost/50&Over8.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesSonia Patrick / Kristie Bryan vs Dianne Albina / Lara Slatniske4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Roset / Tania Biller vs Angela Bowes / Janet Karpan7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Freeman / Darlene Sparks vs Michele Ironsmith / Kelly Armagost4-6, 3-6
2024-09-22vs Hills/Armagost/50&Over8.5WSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKaren MacCormack / Tania Biller vs Jenny Hughes / Michele Ironsmith6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesThuy Duong / Trang Duong vs Katie Healy / Janet Karpan4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-09-15vs Hills/Armagost/50&Over8.5WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMargaret Roset / Melany Jablonski vs Dianne Albina / Lara Slatniske7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSonia Patrick / Rebecca Evangelista vs Angela Bowes / Leticia Leppert4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Karen MacCormack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Margaret Roset
published
4.21
Kristie Bryan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
Sonia Patrick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.14
Kristen Wehrman
published 4
3.92
Rebecca Evangelista
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.87
Melany Jablonski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Lisa Oonk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Tania Biller
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Thuy Duong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Darlene Sparks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Prin Vasseur
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Lisa Freeman
published
Trang Duong
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Evangelista + Melany Jablonski23363% games+5.9% vs expected
Rebecca Evangelista + Sonia Patrick3450% gamesnot enough data
Kristie Bryan + Sonia Patrick2350% gamesnot enough data
Tania Biller + Karen MacCormack4159% gamesnot enough data
Prin Vasseur + Melany Jablonski224 matchesnot enough data
Melany Jablonski + Kristen Wehrman404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Karen MacCormack
23W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
4.34
Margaret Roset
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
4.30
4.5
Kristie Bryan
58W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Sonia Patrick
95W–102L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%88%1%
4.17
4
Kristen Wehrman
64W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
4.14
4
Rebecca Evangelista
113W–52L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.92
4
Melany Jablonski
135W–52L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Lisa Oonk
217W–231L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Tania Biller
75W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.74
Thuy Duong
67W–51L career · 1 line in 2024
97%3%<1%
3.73
4
Darlene Sparks
26W–47L career · 2 lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66
4
Prin Vasseur
125W–155L career · 3 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
Lisa Freeman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Trang Duong
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.