Teams

Webster/Rebs

2025 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.90 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-12-17vs Roller/LR/ChenalLost 02
L#1 SinglesAnna Simpson vs Ashley Burch2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAnna Coon vs Kaitlyn Witherell2-6, 0-6
2025-12-16vs Rech/LR/RebsWon 20
W#1 SinglesMegan Hurtt vs Jessica Leach6-1, 7-5
W#2 SinglesAnna Coon vs Sarah Rech6-3, 6-1
2025-12-09vs Duff/LR/BPLost 02
L#1 SinglesJessica Caple vs Tiffanie Taylor2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAbbey Laureano vs Calandra Bucella3-6, 6-7
2025-11-19vs Doose/Jones/LR/RebsWon 21
W#1 SinglesBethany Downs vs Stefan Jones6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesYerenia Adame Hernandez vs Amanda Gray6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesMegan Hurtt vs Morgan Doughty5-7, 3-4
2025-11-06vs Rutledge/LR/RebsLost 12
L#1 SinglesJessica Caple vs Roz Taylor1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMegan Hurtt vs Brenda Green2-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesAnna Coon vs Leslie Warford6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Yerenia Adame Hernandez
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.09
Bethany Downs
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.85
Megan Hurtt
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.75
Anna Simpson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.65
Anna Coon
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.60
Amy Webster
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.57
Jessica Caple
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.44
Abbey Laureano
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yerenia Adame Hernandez + Bethany Downs3352% games+4.4% vs expected
Amy Webster + Abbey Laureano2338% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yerenia Adame Hernandez
22W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
Bethany Downs
41W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.09
Megan Hurtt
17W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Anna Simpson
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Anna Coon
23W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
3
Amy Webster
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Jessica Caple
1W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
2.5
Abbey Laureano
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%66%34%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.