Teams

Tipton-Mendoza/Knoxville

2025 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-19vs Brill-Shuman/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Tipton / Jennifer Mendoza vs Elsa Roland / Tracy Polite2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAndrea Giraudo vs Renee Bagwell6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKetki Sheth / Katharine Brosnan vs Annabel Sims / Keri Brill1-6, 2-6
2025-03-08vs Brill-Shuman/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Tipton / Hilary Brooks vs Elsa Roland / Catherine Shuman7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJennifer Mendoza vs Renee Bagwell2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKatharine Brosnan / Ketki Sheth vs Keri Brill / Natalia Ward6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.60
Hilary Brooks
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.51
Jennifer Mendoza
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.48
Katharine Brosnan
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.45
Audrey Stokely
published 2.5
2.43
Ashley Tipton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.31
Andrea Giraudo
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.29
Ketki Sheth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.15
Kira Crocker
published
Tracy Serrano
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hilary Brooks + Ashley Tipton3351% games+0.1% vs expected
Hilary Brooks + Jennifer Mendoza303 matchesnot enough data
Hilary Brooks + Katharine Brosnan213 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Tipton + Jennifer Mendoza123 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Tipton + Andrea Giraudo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hilary Brooks
26W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%23%77%
2.60
Jennifer Mendoza
24W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%48%52%
2.51
Katharine Brosnan
21W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
2.5
Audrey Stokely
3W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%63%37%
2.45
2.5
Ashley Tipton
17W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%70%30%
2.43
2.5
Andrea Giraudo
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
0%91%9%
2.31
Ketki Sheth
15W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
2.5
Andrea Hernandez-gomez
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
Kira Crocker
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracy Serrano
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.