Teams

TSR: Tri & Get Us

2022 Tri-Level Women · 4.5,4.0,3.5

18 players · average NTRP 4.09 / SOUTHERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-12-04vs TSR - TrifectaWon 21
L#1 DoublesLaura Emerson / Gabriela Medina vs Trina Beram / Suzanne McLeod4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJoanna Dejesus / Phyllis WAN-HUEN vs Jillian Muro / Gillian Cobb3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErica Cronin / Abbie Grossman vs Ronni Jarvis / Robin Davis6-3, 6-1
2022-11-19vs TSR - TrifectaLost 12
L#1 DoublesAntaeya Foster / Roge Nesbitt vs Trina Beram / Lindsay Pell3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSusan Denicholas / Aimee Heinly vs Kellie Mee / Suzanne McLeod1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAndria McKenna / Abbie Grossman vs Ronni Jarvis / Robin Davis6-3, 7-6
2022-11-13vs TSR - TrifectaLost 03
L#1 DoublesAntaeya Foster / Gabriela Medina vs Trina Beram / Lindsay Pell2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPhyllis WAN-HUEN / Hana Chalupkova vs Nicole Klausz / Barbara Wilson4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLucy Burnes / Yong Ciardi vs Gillian Cobb / Mary Berezowsky4-6, 4-6
2022-11-05vs TSR - TrifectaWon 21
W#1 DoublesAntaeya Foster / Roge Nesbitt vs Lindsay Pell / Helen Chun6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoanna Dejesus / Andrea Moss vs Barbara Wilson / Nicole Klausz3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLucy Burnes / Yong Ciardi vs Katherine Curcio / Ronni Jarvis6-1, 6-3
2022-10-30vs TSR - TrifectaLost 12
L#1 DoublesGabriela Medina / Melissa Berardis vs Lindsay Pell / Trina Beram1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Denicholas / Joanna Dejesus vs Suzanne McLeod / Elizabeth Leary3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesYong Ciardi / Lucy Burnes vs Mary Berezowsky / Heidi DeSiena3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-10-22vs TSR - TrifectaLost 03
L#1 DoublesAntaeya Foster / Gabriela Medina vs Lindsay Pell / Trina Beram3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Moss / Phyllis WAN-HUEN vs Nicole Klausz / Jillian Muro1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAndria McKenna / Erica Cronin vs Kellie Mee / Gillian Cobb6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2022-10-16vs TSR - TrifectaWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelissa Berardis / Claudia Brown vs Lindsay Pell / Trina Beram0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJoanna Dejesus / Phyllis WAN-HUEN vs Suzanne McLeod / Elizabeth Leary1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAimee Heinly / Andria McKenna vs Gillian Cobb / Katherine Curcio7-6, 6-0
2022-10-01vs TSR - TrifectaLost 12
W#1 DoublesLaura Emerson / Antaeya Foster vs Trina Beram / Helen Chun6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLori Calat / Andrea Moss vs Nicole Klausz / Barbara Wilson0-6, 1-4
L#3 DoublesYong Ciardi / Abbie Grossman vs Gillian Cobb / Kellie Mee4-6, 5-7
2022-09-25vs TSR - TrifectaLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Emerson / Roge Nesbitt vs Lindsay Pell / Suzanne McLeod3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Denicholas / Phyllis WAN-HUEN vs Nicole Klausz / Jillian Muro1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesYong Ciardi / Lucy Burnes vs Mary Berezowsky / Heidi DeSiena7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5,4.0,3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TSR - Trifecta09171023218
2TSR: Tri & Get Us09101739274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Antaeya Foster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.15
Laura Emerson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.12
Gabriela Medina
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Lori Calat
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.86
Phyllis WAN-HUEN
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Roge Nesbitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Lucy Burnes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Andria McKenna
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Claudia Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Erica Cronin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Joanna Dejesus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Andrea Moss
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Hana Chalupkova
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.21
Aimee Heinly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Abbie Grossman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Berardis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Denicholas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Yong Ciardi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erica Cronin + Andria McKenna7263% games+11.2% vs expected
Abbie Grossman + Yong Ciardi3261% games+6.7% vs expected
Yong Ciardi + Lucy Burnes5252% games+4.3% vs expected
Joanna Dejesus + Phyllis WAN-HUEN4248% games+2.4% vs expected
Phyllis WAN-HUEN + Melissa Berardis14556% games+1.8% vs expected
Joanna Dejesus + Lucy Burnes4451% games−0.3% vs expected
Gabriela Medina + Antaeya Foster5453% games−0.5% vs expected
Yong Ciardi + Susan Denicholas9165% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Antaeya Foster
91W–35L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Emerson
177W–142L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Gabriela Medina
54W–38L career · 4 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
4.12
4.5
Lori Calat
166W–91L career · type A · 1 line in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.94
4
Phyllis WAN-HUEN
109W–66L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Roge Nesbitt
235W–170L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
Lucy Burnes
127W–48L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Andria McKenna
56W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Claudia Brown
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4
Erica Cronin
35W–8L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Joanna Dejesus
74W–80L career · 4 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
4
Andrea Moss
41W–54L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
3.42
4
Hana Chalupkova
45W–63L career · 1 line in 2022
86%14%<1%
3.36
3.5
Aimee Heinly
62W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Abbie Grossman
37W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Berardis
94W–37L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Denicholas
48W–18L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Yong Ciardi
42W–29L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.