Teams

GF Lobbers

2025 55 & Over Mixed · 7.0 55 & Over Mixed

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MONTANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-09vs Mixed SignalsLost 03
L#1 DoublesRex Derr / Marianne Derr vs Lori Faure / Rick Davis3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Larsen / Bryan Lockerby vs DIANA RAIMONDO / Paul Stouffer6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDouglas Ormseth / Kelly McCulloch vs Laura Toepfer / Jerry Camarillo2-6, 1-6
2025-11-09vs Sultans of SwingWon 21
W#1 DoublesRex Derr / Marianne Derr vs Rita Meyer-lott / Glenn Moffatt7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDouglas Ormseth / Kelly McCulloch vs Bill Wilcox / Becky Wilcox1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBryan Lockerby / Diane Larsen vs Brenda Culver / Robert Leaverton6-2, 6-1
2025-11-08vs Montana/Ruthruff 55& Over MXLost 03
L#1 DoublesRex Derr / Marianne Derr vs Elizabeth Suh / Matt Munding4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Larsen / Bryan Lockerby vs Troy Bean / Jan Schweitzer3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDouglas Ormseth / Kelly McCulloch vs Lori Abbott / Brian Clifton0-6, 2-6
2025-11-08vs Sultans of SwingLost 03
L#1 DoublesRex Derr / Marianne Derr vs Becky Wilcox / Bill Wilcox3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBryan Lockerby / Diane Larsen vs Tom Young / Paula Vernon3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDouglas Ormseth / Kelly McCulloch vs Rita Meyer-lott / Glenn Moffatt3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 55 & Over Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Ruthruff 55& Over MX40120147
2Sultans of Swing135717121
3GF Lobbers1321020133

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bryan Lockerby
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Diane Larsen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Douglas Ormseth
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kelly McCulloch
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Marianne Derr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rex Derr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly McCulloch + Douglas Ormseth044 matchesnot enough data
Bryan Lockerby + Diane Larsen134 matchesnot enough data
Marianne Derr + Rex Derr134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bryan Lockerby
1W–3L career · type T · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Diane Larsen
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Douglas Ormseth
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly McCulloch
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marianne Derr
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rex Derr
1W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.