Teams

StoneCreek / Palmieri

2026 Collier Combo 18 & Over Spring · 7.5 Women - Spring

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-14vs Palmira / MackroryLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Bailey / Kelly Komor vs Jae Marie Fry / Daniela Tombion4-6, 6-7
2026-05-07vs Palmira / MackroryLost 03
L#1 DoublesEmma Shunk / Ayla Rahmberg vs Brittany Lawson / Natalia Zeman1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Bailey / Kelly Komor vs Jae Marie Fry / Megumi Yoshida3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLeticia Lancsarics / Desireliz Villegas vs Elizabeth Brennan / Mara Mazza2-6, 1-6
2026-05-02vs Palmira / MackroryLost 12
L#1 DoublesAyla Rahmberg / Dena Palmieri vs Megan MacKrory / Daniela Tombion7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesIvania Vega / Whitney Callahan vs SUE BECK / Natalia Zeman1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Mortillaro / Kelly Komor vs Aimee Halquist / Jennifer Brown6-4, 7-5
2026-04-30vs Palmira / MackroryLost 12
W#1 DoublesDena Palmieri / Emily Burstein vs SUE BECK / Melody Miller6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesWhitney Callahan / Melissa Bailey vs Megan MacKrory / Daniela Tombion2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Mortillaro / Kelly Komor vs Stephanie Verhalen / Brooke Sykes4-6, 0-6
2026-04-16vs Palmira / MackroryLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelissa Bailey / Cheryl Ingram vs Jennifer Brown / Brittany Lawson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Mortillaro / Kelly Komor vs Melody Miller / SUE BECK0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDena Palmieri / Whitney Callahan vs Megumi Yoshida / Kelly Stein6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-04-09vs Palmira / MackroryLost 03
L#1 DoublesDena Palmieri / Ayla Rahmberg vs Megan MacKrory / Nikki Miller2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLeticia Lancsarics / Kelly Komor vs SUE BECK / Mara Mazza1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesIvania Vega / Emily Burstein vs Brooke Sykes / Sara Munholland4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-04-08vs Palmira / MackroryLost 03
L#1 DoublesCheryl Ingram / Leticia Lancsarics vs Daniela Tombion / Elizabeth Brennan2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesIvania Vega / Jane Mills vs Megan MacKrory / Natalia Zeman5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDena Palmieri / Ayla Rahmberg vs Nikki Miller / Stephanie Verhalen7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-26vs Palmira / MackroryLost 03
L#1 DoublesJane Mills / Ivania Vega vs Megan MacKrory / Daniela Tombion2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDesireliz Villegas / Emma Shunk vs Stephanie Verhalen / Brooke Sykes4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDena Palmieri / Angela Roldan vs Aimee Halquist / Jennifer Brown0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.5 Women - Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Palmira / Mackrory8022210141
2StoneCreek / Palmieri0822244274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Ivania Vega
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.63
Melissa Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Emily Burstein
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Dena Palmieri
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Anne Mortillaro
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Cheryl Ingram
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Angela Roldan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Desireliz Villegas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Ayla Rahmberg
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Jane Mills
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Emma Shunk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kelly Komor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Leticia Lancsarics
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Whitney Callahan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ayla Rahmberg + Dena Palmieri033 matchesnot enough data
Anne Mortillaro + Kelly Komor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ivania Vega
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
Melissa Bailey
14W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.63
Emily Burstein
13W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
4
Dena Palmieri
1W–5L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Anne Mortillaro
36W–66L career · 3 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
3.42
3.5
Cheryl Ingram
107W–67L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Angela Roldan
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Desireliz Villegas
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Ayla Rahmberg
0W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Jane Mills
105W–100L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Emma Shunk
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kelly Komor
1W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Leticia Lancsarics
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Whitney Callahan
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.