Teams

6-RLong--Eno

2022 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-12vs 1-JMontague-CCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesConor Lynch / David Bautz vs Travis Angle / Stephen Arrowood4-6, 3-6
2022-10-10Won 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Bautz / Robert Long Jr vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-03vs 2-ROakley-Eno ComboLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Poole / David Bautz vs Reggie Oakley / Tom Luben4-6, 2-6
2022-09-19vs 3-AYoung-EV-Combo-6.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesFJ Magee / Alex Kappus vs Michael Andre / Lee Goldberg1-6, 1-6
2022-08-24vs 4-ZRowles-EnoLost 01
L#2 DoublesFJ Magee / David Bautz vs Tanner Dellinger / Dan Heiser3-6, 1-6
2022-08-22vs 2-ROakley-Eno ComboLost 01
L#2 DoublesMatt Carter / David Bautz vs Reggie Oakley / Howard Kashefsky3-6, 3-6
2022-08-08vs 3-AYoung-EV-Combo-6.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAlex Kappus / David Bautz vs Evan Sitton / Ethan Holston4-6, 3-6
2022-08-03Lost 01
L#2 DoublesFJ Magee / Matt Carter vs Will Johnson / Chuck Clark2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Conor Lynch
published 3
2.82
Mary T Long
published
2.78
Matt Carter
published
2.77
David Bautz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.49
FJ Magee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jordan Nader
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Bautz + FJ Magee123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Conor Lynch
17W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95
Mary T Long
48W–104L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
Matt Carter
4W–16L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
3
David Bautz
28W–43L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
FJ Magee
24W–63L career · 3 lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.49
Jordan Nader
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.