Teams

RFC:SmartAces:Deeley

2022 ME Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.0 Women South

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-12vs RFC:Topspinistas:CrosbyWon 32
L#1 DoublesMarsha Traill / Sarah Scott vs Jenna Ashburn / Pamela Elwell4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Holland vs Kimberly Nappi7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Kendrick / Linda Murray vs Kayla Bartlett / Holly Rich2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesSarah Parisien vs Elizabeth Langham6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Deeley / Karen Phillips vs Lucy Leighton / Denise LaRue5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-04vs MP:Misfits:GreenbaumWon 21
L#1 DoublesSarah Holland / Elizabeth Deeley vs Ariel Kernis / Jane Tuttle2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Parisien vs Kathy Coggeshall6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesSarah Scott vs Amanda Bunker6-2, 6-2
2022-05-22vs WOOD:TheWoodlands:BryantWon 31
W#1 DoublesMarsha Traill / Amanda Bowers vs Ann Miller / Patricia Lefevre5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSarah Parisien vs Whitney Wignall6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSarah Holland / Sarah Scott vs Austin Reeves / Yemaya StClair6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Deeley / Ann McCormick vs Morgan Cohen / Sandra Couch Kelly2-6, 0-6
2022-05-22vs MRC:YNot:RoperWon 31
W#1 DoublesAmanda Bowers / Sarah Holland vs Julie Faure / Linda Fu4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSarah Parisien vs Jennifer Roper6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMarsha Traill / Linda Murray vs Kimberly Nicolet / Amy Jackson3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesChloe Howe / Sarah Scott vs Erica Gates / Elizabeth O'Connor6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-04-30vs RFC:Topspinistas:CrosbyLost 23
L#1 DoublesMonique Violette / Marsha Traill vs Pamela Elwell / Jenna Ashburn1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Scott vs Andrea Otis-Higgins2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Holland / Amanda Bowers vs Elizabeth Langham / Wendy Cannon6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSarah Parisien vs Lori Bianchi6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesChloe Howe / Elizabeth Deeley vs Katie Blackburn / Lori Nadeau1-6, 0-6
2022-04-30vs WOOD:TheWoodlands:BryantLost 12
W#1 DoublesSarah Scott / Sarah Holland vs Dawn Morong / Ruth Matt6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLinda Murray / Marsha Traill vs Patricia Lefevre / Ann Marie Collins5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Deeley vs Whitney Wignall0-6, 0-6
2022-04-16vs MRC:YNot:RoperLost 12
W#1 SinglesSarah Scott vs Kimberly Nicolet6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMarsha Traill / Linda Murray vs Linda Fu / Tonya Holt2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Deeley vs Amy Jackson2-6, 1-6
2022-04-16vs MP:Misfits:GreenbaumLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Deeley / Monique Violette vs Wendy Greenbaum / Ariel Kernis0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Scott vs Jane Tuttle4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnn McCormick / Marsha Traill vs Alyson Cummings / Jane Jukes0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.0 Women South
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MP:Misfits:Greenbaum62251534289
2RFC:Topspinistas:Crosby44231737312
3MRC:YNot:Roper44192146338
4WOOD:TheWoodlands:Bryant35172349351
5RFC:SmartAces:Deeley35162452391

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.76
Sarah Parisien
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.58
Marsha Traill
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Chloe Howe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.10
Elizabeth Deeley
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Linda Murray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Kendrick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Holland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sarah Scott
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marsha Traill + Lisa Kendrick4354% gamesnot enough data
Marsha Traill + Linda Murray033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Parisien
38W–72L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
Marsha Traill
40W–86L career · 7 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
2.58
2.5
Chloe Howe
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Elizabeth Deeley
17W–71L career · 11 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Linda Murray
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Kendrick
12W–24L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Sarah Holland
11W–10L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah Scott
5W–3L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.