Teams

Chili Peppers

2022 Anne Arundel Adult 18 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-06-29vs Netchix Over 18Won 10
W#2 SinglesKrista Swetz vs Jeannie Park3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-26Won 10
W#2 SinglesKrista Swetz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-25vs The Vicious AcesLost 01
L#2 SinglesLezlie Moreland vs Margaret Dorsey2-6, 0-3
2022-06-21vs BernsteinWon 10
W#2 SinglesKrista Swetz vs Ellen McLaughlin6-2, 6-4
2022-06-07vs AceAceBabyWon 10
W#2 SinglesKrista Swetz vs Beyza Akcam6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-05vs Party at the NetSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKrista Swetz vs Kerry McQuighan4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLezlie Moreland vs Kathy Crowley3-6, 1-6
2022-06-04Won 20
W#1 SinglesKrista Swetz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesLezlie Moreland vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-21vs MartinLost 01
L#2 SinglesKrista Swetz vs Sherry Orebaugh7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2022-05-15vs Bontempo/McClatchySplit 11
L#1 SinglesKrista Swetz vs Anne Marie Peterson3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesLezlie Moreland vs Lisa Marthens6-3, 6-2
2022-05-03Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKrista Swetz vs Rachel Price3-6, 5-7
2022-04-02vs The Vicious AcesLost 02
L#2 DoublesJoanne Connelly / Lezlie Moreland vs Claris Brock / Michelle Moore1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKrista Swetz vs Meshia Easley6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Kathleen Garrett
published
3.81
Jennifer Noronha
published
3.74
PAULA SMITH
published
3.68
Tynika Wilson
published
3.54
Joanne Connelly
published
3.45
Jill Lehr
published
3.43
Krista Swetz
usually #2 Singles 70%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 3.5
3.35
Lezlie Moreland
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.22
Tami Burt
published
3.18
Cindi Hodskins
published 3.5
3.14
Ashley Doot Vaughn
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

PAULA SMITH + Tynika Wilson201850% games+1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Garrett
44W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Jennifer Noronha
10W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
PAULA SMITH
48W–32L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Tynika Wilson
22W–23L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Joanne Connelly
2W–13L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
Jill Lehr
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.45
3.5
Krista Swetz
42W–53L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Lezlie Moreland
157W–166L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Tami Burt
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
98%2%<1%
3.22
3.5
Cindi Hodskins
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Ashley Doot Vaughn
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.