Teams

Yadkin/Mays-Cartee/18+8.5

2023 Yadkin Valley Combo 18 & Over · Women 8.5 - Friday Mornings

14 players · average NTRP 4.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-10-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Mays / Erin Huffines vs Katie Thompson / Karen Regan6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-10-06vs Yadkin/Rackley/18+8.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Helms / Erin Huffines vs Caroline Downs / Jill Bowman4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-09-15Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMimi Cartee / Erin Huffines vs Ann Campbell / Julie Lewis3-6, 4-6
2023-09-08vs Yadkin/Rackley/18+8.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesErin Huffines / Kissie Stroup vs Penny Johnson / Beth Faircloth3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.5 - Friday Mornings have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.60
Bety Miranda
published 5
4.44
4.18
Jane Clarke
published
4.12
Dia Roberts
published 4.5
4.08
Linda Helms
published
4.06
3.97
Aundrea Hendley
published 4.5
3.94
Whitney Ellis
published
3.87
Kissie Stroup
published
3.84
Erin Huffines
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
Mimi Cartee
published
3.63
Jennifer Mays
published
Joann Hartzell
published
Nadia Gregory
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Mays + Bridget Gislimberti241259% games+9.6% vs expected
Aundrea Hendley + Kissie Stroup6259% gamesnot enough data
Dia Roberts + Aundrea Hendley1439% gamesnot enough data
Dia Roberts + Linda Helms3253% gamesnot enough data
Nadia Gregory + Whitney Ellis404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Bety Miranda
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
4.60
Tiffany Vanhpraseuth
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
4.44
Jane Clarke
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Dia Roberts
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
4.12
Linda Helms
20W–12L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
4.08
4
Bridget Gislimberti
45W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
4.06
4.5
Aundrea Hendley
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.97
Whitney Ellis
49W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.94
Kissie Stroup
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
3.87
4
Erin Huffines
173W–130L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.84
Mimi Cartee
17W–17L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
Jennifer Mays
70W–42L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
Joann Hartzell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nadia Gregory
13W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.