Teams

Capote (Tamiami Tennis)

2022 Miami-Dade Adult 18 & Over - Fall Night · 4.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.43 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-12-16vs Rodriguez (Alper JCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesDonald Encinas / Nahuel Itzcovitch vs Jorge Alberto Rodriguez / Jose Mayorga6-2, 6-2
2021-12-02vs Saldivia (Ocean Club)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDonald Encinas / Nahuel Itzcovitch vs Julio Chamorro / Jose Buezas4-6, 2-6
2021-11-16vs Ghini (Tropical Park)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDonald Encinas / Nahuel Itzcovitch vs GABRIELE GHINI / RICARDO GIRON5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2021-11-09vs Abdelnur (Biltmore)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDonald Encinas / Nahuel Itzcovitch vs Kenny Oliver / Jonathan Drucker2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-11-04vs Ghizelini (Salvadore Park)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDonald Encinas / Nahuel Itzcovitch vs Denis Pierrot / Oscar Ricardo Marquez Tortoriello3-6, 4-6
2021-10-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesNahuel Itzcovitch / Donald Encinas vs Jesus Larranaga / Miguel Daud6-2, 6-2
2021-10-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesNahuel Itzcovitch / Donald Encinas vs Miguel Alvarado / Yugoslav Cuculiza6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2021-09-30vs Ghini (Tropical Park)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarmine Colarusso / Donald Encinas vs Juan Bozo / Juan Cortez3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-09-21vs Abdelnur (Biltmore)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDonald Encinas / Fernando Capote vs Antonio Necuze / Miguel Fundora2-6, 3-6
2021-09-09vs Ghizelini (Salvadore Park)Won 10
W#1 DoublesDonald Encinas / Nahuel Itzcovitch vs Raymond Hackney / Alex Barrellier5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Donald Encinas
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
David Hoffman
published 4.5
4.21
Fernando Capote
published 4.5
4.20
Felipe Torres
published 4.5
4.12
Giancarlo Capote
published 4.5
4.11
Alexandro Tani
published 4.5
3.89
3.64
Xavier Bello
published
Rajiv Gupta
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fernando Capote + Giancarlo Capote213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Donald Encinas
124W–87L career · 10 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
David Hoffman
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Fernando Capote
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Felipe Torres
10W–17L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Giancarlo Capote
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Alexandro Tani
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
4
Alejandro Gonzalez
22W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
Xavier Bello
14W–8L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Rajiv Gupta
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.