Teams

Rippit/Stinnett/San Ramon

2024 Tri-Level 3.5 · 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-10-26vs ASRC/Mun/AlmadenLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndrew Stinnett / Marcus Wertz vs Sang Gyum Kim / Sam Behbehani2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTodd Humphrey / Walter Martin vs Jaewan Mun / Shane Park3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Matt Lourens
published
3.97
3.90
Bryan Kurtz
published 4
3.85
Andrew Stinnett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Todd Humphrey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Arun Kumar
published 4
3.61
Walter Martin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Sean Baker
published
3.40
Vishal Shenoy
published 3.5
3.38
Chad Harrison
published 3.5
Marcus Wertz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Walter Martin + Andrew Stinnett404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matt Lourens
35W–24L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
4.28
Mukundan Swaminathan
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.97
4
Bryan Kurtz
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Andrew Stinnett
23W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
Todd Humphrey
25W–22L career · 1 line in 2024
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Arun Kumar
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66
Walter Martin
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.61
Sean Baker
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Vishal Shenoy
63W–56L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Chad Harrison
5W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.38
Marcus Wertz
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.