Teams

Heritage Bay - K. Keillor

2022 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 6.5 Combo 50 & Over Women Spring

12 players · average NTRP 3.42 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-10vs Spring Winners - Marco YMCA - CorreaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCheryl Copps / Aggie Rupert vs Dana Sacks / Pattie Yergler6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKate Keillor / Gay Kronen vs Joyce Hail / Mary Mueller3-6, 3-6
2022-05-03vs Grey OaksWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Copps / Aggie Rupert vs Barbara Lounsbury / Lisa Spartin6-2, 2-0
2022-04-26vs Hammock Bay - P. CraneLost 02
L#2 DoublesJeanette Thevening / Jill Sanders vs Trina Clarkson / Bridget Smagala2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCheryl Copps / Susie Beaudet vs Cheryl Solimine / Jennifer Stonebreaker3-6, 1-6
2022-04-19vs Pelican Bay South - J. HowardWon 10
W#2 DoublesJill Sanders / Jeanette Thevening vs Toni Marie Silverman / Sher Canada6-2, 6-2
2022-04-05vs Isles of Collier - OddySplit 11
W#2 DoublesJeanette Thevening / Jill Sanders vs Denise Reilly / Kathleen Barger7-5, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKate Keillor / Christine Kriss vs Pamela McGhee / Lisa Hayes3-6, 2-6
2022-03-22vs Village Walk Bonita - IversonWon 10
W#3 DoublesGay Kronen / Cheryl Copps vs Ellen Iverson / Hope Malin6-3, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo 50 & Over Women Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Christine Kriss
published 4
3.77
Aggie Rupert
published 4
3.35
Susie Beaudet
published
3.35
Jill Sanders
published
3.30
Jeanette Thevening
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Jennifer Amaya
published
3.07
Maureen Rennie
published
2.97
Rachel Plisko
published
2.94
Cheryl Copps
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Rhonda Kelly
published
2.76
Andrea Kansy
published 3
2.71
Kate Keillor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Copps + Kate Keillor182849% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Copps + Jennifer Amaya213 matchesnot enough data
Jeanette Thevening + Kate Keillor213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Kriss
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Aggie Rupert
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Susie Beaudet
19W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.35
Jill Sanders
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Jeanette Thevening
144W–70L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Jennifer Amaya
25W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%21%79%
3.11
Maureen Rennie
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Rachel Plisko
13W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Cheryl Copps
235W–133L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
2.94
Rhonda Kelly
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%23%
2.91
3
Andrea Kansy
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Kate Keillor
171W–148L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.