Teams

Walnut Creek TC 40AM4.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 4.5

20 players · average NTRP 4.27 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-16vs WILLOW PASS PK 40AM4.5AWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlex Aguilar / Michael Attiyeh vs Carlos Carbajal / Moshrek Sobhy6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesStephen Flynn vs Bellal Daunish2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-03-04vs REFUGIO PK 40AM4.5ALost 13
L#1 DoublesMartin Dunlap / Chris Bown vs Sommay Tao Payanouvong / Diego Roig2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesArash Azarkhish vs Jason Manalac0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBrian Italia / Michael Attiyeh vs Kian Ong / Martin Nunez6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSanjay Backliwal / Matthew Matrisian vs Patrick Beauchemin / Michael Scott3-6, 1-6
2025-02-09vs WILLOW PASS PK 40AM4.5AWon 40
W#1 DoublesDebashis Panda / Stephen Flynn vs Micah Cavin / Matt Grintsaig6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesArash Azarkhish vs SACHIDANAND ALLE6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrian Italia / Cameron Larner vs Carlos Carbajal / Blain Wong6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHarish Natarajan / Sanjay Backliwal vs Bellal Daunish / Moshrek Sobhy6-2, 6-2
2025-01-11vs REFUGIO PK 40AM4.5ALost 13
L#1 DoublesManish Singh / Jacob Roig vs Michael Nathe / Sommay Tao Payanouvong3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesStephen Flynn vs Michael Scott6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCesar Hernandez / Mark Chase vs Richard Chapman / Kian Ong3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDebashis Panda / Michael Attiyeh vs Diego Roig / Peter Sullivan2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Debashis Panda
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Cameron Larner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Chris Bown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
David Wu
published 4.5
4.24
Martin Dunlap
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.24
Stephen Flynn
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.24
Teddy Handoko
published
4.23
Brian Italia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.11
Michael Attiyeh
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.06
Sanjay Backliwal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.03
Harish Natarajan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Dan Gullion
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.94
Jonathan Maze
published
3.90
Arash Azarkhish
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.75
Mark Chase
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Jacob Roig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Alex Aguilar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Manish Singh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Cesar Hernandez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Matthew Matrisian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sanjay Backliwal + Harish Natarajan2343% games−8.3% vs expected
Jonathan Maze + Stephen Flynn404 matchesnot enough data
Martin Dunlap + Michael Attiyeh123 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Flynn + Debashis Panda303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Debashis Panda
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
4.31
4.5
Cameron Larner
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Chris Bown
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
David Wu
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Martin Dunlap
10W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%2%
4.24
Stephen Flynn
27W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
Teddy Handoko
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Brian Italia
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
Michael Attiyeh
9W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
4.11
Sanjay Backliwal
10W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Harish Natarajan
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03
4
Dan Gullion
37W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
Jonathan Maze
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.94
4
Arash Azarkhish
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Mark Chase
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.75
4
Jacob Roig
9W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Alex Aguilar
24W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Manish Singh
15W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Cesar Hernandez
2W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
Matthew Matrisian
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.