Teams

HRCA PINK

2022 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME

7 players · average NTRP 2.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-09-14vs KC YELLOWWon 10
W#1 DoublesTosha MacK / Rebecca Robbins vs Sally McCubbin / Laurie van Sickle6-3, 6-1
2022-08-24vs LEBTC BLUELost 01
L#1 SinglesTosha MacK vs Julie Horsting3-6, 3-6
2022-08-17vs CK GOLDWon 30
W#1 DoublesCasey Clarke / Mollie Anderson vs Kendra Curry / Andrea Hei6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTina Ruggiero vs Leslie Dennis6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAngie Smart / Rebecca Robbins vs Andrea Shearer / Michelle Applehans6-4, 7-5
2022-08-10vs KC YELLOWWon 10
W#2 DoublesRebecca Robbins / Tosha MacK vs Amy Green / Tracy Rotter6-2, 6-4
2022-08-03vs CCC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesTosha MacK / Mollie Anderson vs Leesa Blanding / Olivia Booysen2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Casey Clarke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Mollie Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Tosha MacK
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.40
Melissa Pace
published
Angie Smart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Stephanie Nochlin
published
Tina Ruggiero
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tosha MacK + Melissa Pace4170% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Pace + Mollie Anderson134 matchesnot enough data
Tina Ruggiero + Mollie Anderson033 matchesnot enough data
Angie Smart + Mollie Anderson303 matchesnot enough data
Casey Clarke + Mollie Anderson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Casey Clarke
23W–9L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.86
Mollie Anderson
46W–37L career · 1 line in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.63
2.5
Tosha MacK
39W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%68%32%
2.44
Melissa Pace
29W–27L career · no lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
2.40
2.5
Angie Smart
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Stephanie Nochlin
21W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tina Ruggiero
22W–11L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.