Teams

Crisler

2026 Auburn USTA 18 & Over Combo · 8.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-25vs WilliamsLost 12
W#1 DoublesLeigh Bosman / Jenni Payne vs Andi Lee / Ann Bergman6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesHeidi Hulon / Jessica Ferris vs Amy Haley / Munkyung Kim4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMelinda Weissinger / Marissa Rozman vs Katie Gerst / Cameran Williams0-6, 3-6
2026-08-20vs WilliamsLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeigh Bosman / Jessica Ferris vs Andi Lee / Munkyung Kim1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Harvey / Michelle Crisler vs Tomoko Maeda / Ann Bergman3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMadison Sowden / Brenda Nell vs Jessica Bodine / Cameran Williams1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 8.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Crisler000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Teresa Gunn
published
3.74
Jenni Payne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Michelle Crisler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Melinda Weissinger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Marissa Rozman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Robin Weyant
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Heidi Hulon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Madison Sowden
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Brenda Nell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.78
Jessica Ferris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Leigh Bosman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Crisler + Brenda Nell7269% games+15.9% vs expected
Melinda Weissinger + Robin Weyant21136% games+1.4% vs expected
Robin Weyant + Michelle Crisler134 matchesnot enough data
Robin Weyant + Madison Sowden123 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Nell + Madison Sowden033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Teresa Gunn
6W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.78
Jenni Payne
39W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.74
Michelle Crisler
18W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.38
Melinda Weissinger
5W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Marissa Rozman
37W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.17
Robin Weyant
17W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Heidi Hulon
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
Madison Sowden
2W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
Brenda Nell
13W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
88%12%<1%
2.83
Jessica Ferris
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
2.78
Leigh Bosman
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.