Teams

CMiller (Charlotte CC)

2023 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 5.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-10-16vs JSwanson (Springfield)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Catherine Chesney / Emily Tindel vs Erica Turkus / Karen Garland6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-10-13vs MWalters (Carmel)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEmily Tindel / Mary Catherine Chesney vs Kara Olsen / Jennifer Hutson2-6, 1-6
2023-09-08vs EWhite/SAbbott (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCatherine Miller / Emily Tindel vs Kelly Morris / Samantha Abbott5-7, 0-6
2023-08-18vs DFricke (Firethorne)Won 10
W#3 DoublesEmily Tindel / Elizabeth Jack vs Jennifer Pollino / Patty Sweeney6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Elizabeth Jack
published
2.90
Haley Cheek
published
2.85
2.84
Taylor Russ
published
2.69
Emily Tindel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.68
Anna Williams
published 3
2.54
Kerry Baldwin
published
2.43
Nancy Lowry
published
Gigi Harris
published
Simpson Schmitt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Ruth Kelly + Emily Tindel224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Jack
6W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
2.99
Haley Cheek
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.90
3
Catherine Ruth Kelly
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
Taylor Russ
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
2.84
3
Emily Tindel
32W–64L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%89%1%
2.69
3
Anna Williams
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
2.68
Kerry Baldwin
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
38%61%<1%
2.54
Nancy Lowry
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
2.43
Gigi Harris
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Simpson Schmitt
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.