Teams

KC-RH TEAL

2024 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-30Split 11
L#1 DoublesKristen Weeks / Jacqueline Tynes vs Kassandra Hurley / Lindsey Talaga5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTeresa Granath vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-23vs LEBTC NAVYWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Gonyea / Jacqueline Tynes vs Jana Warwick / Carrie Erickson6-2, 6-2
2024-07-16vs HRCA-N GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesTeresa Granath / Jennifer Gonyea vs Roberta Seifert / Janet Swanson6-1, 6-2
2024-07-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Tynes / Elizabeth Low vs Kristi Mathieson / Karen McIntire6-3, 6-3
2024-07-02Split 11
L#1 DoublesTeresa Granath / Elizabeth Low vs Carrie Bryan / Barbara Hall3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJacqueline Tynes vs Heidi Kelly6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Jacqueline Tynes
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.51
Elizabeth Low
published
3.43
Amanda King
published 3.5
3.31
Kristen Weeks
published
3.19
Teresa Granath
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Cathy Welch
published 3.5
3.12
Kim Rachwalski
published
3.07
Stacey Persichetti
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacey Persichetti + Kim Rachwalski2743% games−7.6% vs expected
Teresa Granath + Kristen Weeks134 matchesnot enough data
Amanda King + Kim Rachwalski123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jacqueline Tynes
42W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.83
Elizabeth Low
41W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Amanda King
28W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
Kristen Weeks
18W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Teresa Granath
81W–59L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Cathy Welch
29W–30L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
Kim Rachwalski
42W–44L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Stacey Persichetti
10W–21L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.