Teams

HCC - Aldeen

2023 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over - Night · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over Night - Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-05vs HCC 40 LoveWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelanie Clem / Lara Slatniske vs Stephane Duroseau / Deb Spears6-3, 6-0
2023-05-22vs HCC Wise AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesMelany Jablonski / Anne Butler vs Lisa Oonk / Nafari Morris6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTania Biller / Christina Dausch vs Evonski Lennear / Amy Bodine6-1, 6-0
2023-05-08vs HCC 40 LoveWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne-Lucie Bouchard / Lara Slatniske vs Lita Hollister / Allison Guerra6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTania Biller / Lindsey Robbins vs Carey Watts / Matura Suksai7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMarnie Bauer / Melany Jablonski vs Deb Spears / Ida-M Pedersen6-2, 6-2
2023-05-01vs HCC Wise AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTania Biller / Lindsey Robbins vs Kelly Armagost / Lisa Oonk7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesFarheen Aldeen / Christina Dausch vs Evonski Lennear / Victoria Romero Lara6-4, 6-1
2023-04-17vs HCC 40 LoveWon 20
W#1 DoublesTania Biller / Lindsey Robbins vs Jennifer Price / Kristen Wehrman7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMarnie Bauer / Jennifer Garlick vs Kami Barnes / Barbara Young5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2023-04-10vs HCC Wise AcesWon 30
W#1 DoublesLara Slatniske / Anne-Lucie Bouchard vs Betty Mahon / Lisa Oonk6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJennifer Garlick / Christina Dausch vs Victoria Romero Lara / Amy Bodine6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMelany Jablonski / Stephanie Wilson vs Jana Bridge / Lesley Metzler6-4, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over Night - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Farheen Aldeen
published
4.03
Melanie Clem
published
4.00
Janet Karpan
published
3.87
Melany Jablonski
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Lara Slatniske
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Christina Dausch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Jennifer Garlick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
3.75
Marnie Bauer
published
3.74
Lindsey Robbins
published
3.74
Tania Biller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Anne Butler
published 4
3.71
Shannon Deck
published
3.19
Stephanie Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Garlick + Christina Dausch14166% games+6.4% vs expected
Anne Butler + Marnie Bauer3348% games−3.2% vs expected
Tania Biller + Christina Dausch17957% games−6.1% vs expected
Anne Butler + Lindsey Robbins3448% games−7.7% vs expected
Melany Jablonski + Jennifer Garlick3254% gamesnot enough data
Tania Biller + Jennifer Garlick314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Garlick + Lara Slatniske033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Farheen Aldeen
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%1%
4.17
Melanie Clem
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
4.03
Janet Karpan
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Melany Jablonski
135W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Lara Slatniske
130W–79L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Christina Dausch
180W–109L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Jennifer Garlick
153W–95L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Anne-Lucie Bouchard
30W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Marnie Bauer
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
Lindsey Robbins
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Tania Biller
75W–49L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Anne Butler
17W–16L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.72
Shannon Deck
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Stephanie Wilson
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.