Teams

Lake Cane-Stinson

2025 ORANGESEMINOLE Adult 18 & Over - WINTER Evenings · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-01-29vs Ft Gatlin-MassadLost 14
W#1 DoublesJohn Coppolella / Sasha Stanisic vs Christopher Maier / Martin Mudd6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRaymond Rauber vs Kurt Borgsmiller4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJames Webber / Joseph Halk vs William Vazquez / Viny Srinivasan6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesChris Scheer vs Jake Jensen2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesScott Stinson / Pepper Ohara vs ANDRES GOMEZ / Bob Margeson4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Ben Grauer
published 3.5
3.31
Raymond Rauber
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.30
Scott Stinson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Tim Symons
published
3.11
John Coppolella
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Joseph Halk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
James Webber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Ray Bendzinski
published
2.94
Pepper Ohara
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Keith Greiveldinger
published
2.87
Sasha Stanisic
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Chris Scheer
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Jeff Loeffert
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pepper Ohara + Scott Stinson1539% games−5.0% vs expected
John Coppolella + Pepper Ohara1636% gamesnot enough data
John Coppolella + Keith Greiveldinger134 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Halk + James Webber044 matchesnot enough data
Keith Greiveldinger + Scott Stinson224 matchesnot enough data
John Coppolella + Scott Stinson303 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Halk + Sasha Stanisic033 matchesnot enough data
Scott Stinson + James Webber213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ben Grauer
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
Raymond Rauber
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Scott Stinson
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.30
Tim Symons
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.12
John Coppolella
10W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Joseph Halk
4W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
James Webber
7W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Ray Bendzinski
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
Pepper Ohara
2W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
Keith Greiveldinger
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.92
Sasha Stanisic
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.87
3
Chris Scheer
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Jeff Loeffert
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.