Teams

JDichak (WSRC)

2023 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Thurs PM

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-08-13vs RVojjini (Queens)Lost 02
L#2 SinglesMichael Twer vs Rakesh Kumar Vojjini3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJoseph Dichak vs Devon DeMaine1-6, 3-6
2023-08-10Won 10
W#2 SinglesMichael Twer vs Daniel Gonzalez7-5, 6-2
2023-07-27vs XTang (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDaniel Kolepp vs Xuezhi Tang4-6, 4-6
2023-07-13vs WLewis (Charlotte Indoor)Split 11
W#1 SinglesMichael Twer vs Will Lewis III6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMike Gentile vs Scott MacIntosh0-6, 3-6
2023-07-06vs IFuster (Queens)Won 20
W#1 SinglesMichael Twer vs JACK TCHIRKOW0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJoseph Dichak vs Taylor Brown6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-03Won 20
W#2 SinglesMichael Twer vs Robb Sanders6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJoseph Dichak vs Matt Manning6-2, 6-1
2023-06-29vs EWeinbrenner (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesMike Gentile vs Kenneth Dorado4-6, 3-6
2023-06-26Won 10
W#1 SinglesJoseph Dichak vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-08vs BStover/RShore (Blakeney)Won 20
W#2 SinglesMichael Twer vs John Suther6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMike Gentile vs Nitesh Upadhyay2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-01vs THull (Lifetime)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDaniel Kolepp vs Prakhar Paharia6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Daniel Kolepp
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Joseph Dichak
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Mike Gentile
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Michael Twer
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Alberto Botero
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Gentile + Joseph Dichak2738% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Kolepp + Mike Gentile314 matchesnot enough data
Michael Twer + Mike Gentile213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daniel Kolepp
164W–66L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Joseph Dichak
138W–146L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Mike Gentile
114W–104L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Michael Twer
50W–70L career · 6 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Alberto Botero
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.