Teams

Crowley 4.0-3.0 18

2025 Tri-Level 18 and Over · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-03vs Lamar 3.0-4.0 TriLevelSplit 11
W#2 DoublesRaja Ekambaram / David Stisher vs Chuck Lamar / Hudson Hatfield6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoey Rushing / Jacob Tinsley vs Steven Derrick / Kevin Stone2-6, 4-6
2025-07-20vs Lamar 3.0-4.0 TriLevelLost 12
L#1 DoublesReece Carson / Kerwin Wade vs Wesley Swoopes / Brady Mann6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Stisher / Raja Ekambaram vs Marc Howell / Murray Edmondson1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJoey Rushing / Slade Berryman vs Steven Derrick / Kevin Stone7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2025-07-11vs Lamar 3.0-4.0 TriLevelLost 02
L#2 DoublesEugene McNutt / Stephen Howell vs Marc Howell / Murray Edmondson1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJacob Tinsley / Slade Berryman vs Steven Derrick / Christopher Proctor3-6, 0-6
2025-07-05vs Lamar 3.0-4.0 TriLevelLost 12
L#1 DoublesReece Carson / Kerwin Wade vs Brady Mann / Hudson Hatfield6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMalachi Duncan / Raja Ekambaram vs Josh Wisener / Chuck Lamar7-5, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJacob Tinsley / Doyle Dutton vs Christopher Proctor / Steven Derrick0-6, 0-6
2025-06-28vs Lamar 3.0-4.0 TriLevelWon 20
W#2 DoublesRaja Ekambaram / Eugene McNutt vs Josh Wisener / Marc Howell7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSlade Berryman / Joey Rushing vs Christopher Proctor / Steven Derrick6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-25vs Lamar 3.0-4.0 TriLevelLost 03
L#1 DoublesNewell Johnson / Kerwin Wade vs Hudson Hatfield / Brady Mann0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKip Potter / David Stisher vs Josh Wisener / Chuck Lamar3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesStephen Howell / Joey Rushing vs Christopher Proctor / Steven Derrick6-7, 1-6
2025-06-17vs Lamar 3.0-4.0 TriLevelLost 03
L#1 DoublesNewell Johnson / Reece Carson vs Hudson Hatfield / Wesley Swoopes3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Stisher / Stephen Howell vs Murray Edmondson / Marc Howell2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSlade Berryman / Doyle Dutton vs Christopher Proctor / Kevin Stone0-6, 2-6
2025-05-29vs Lamar 3.0-4.0 TriLevelWon 21
W#1 DoublesReece Carson / Newell Johnson vs Hudson Hatfield / Wesley Swoopes6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRAUNAQ BAJAJ / Malachi Duncan vs Josh Wisener / Murray Edmondson5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJacob Tinsley / Doyle Dutton vs Steven Derrick / Christopher Proctor0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Kerwin Wade
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Newell Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Perry Baker
published
3.29
Raja Ekambaram
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
RAUNAQ BAJAJ
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Kip Potter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Eugene McNutt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
David Stisher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Joey Rushing
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Doyle Dutton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jacob Tinsley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Malachi Duncan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Reece Carson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Slade Berryman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kip Potter + David Stisher3247% games+8.2% vs expected
Kerwin Wade + Newell Johnson3247% gamesnot enough data
Perry Baker + Kerwin Wade044 matchesnot enough data
Raja Ekambaram + David Stisher123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kerwin Wade
18W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.47
Newell Johnson
70W–73L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
3.46
Perry Baker
22W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Raja Ekambaram
7W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
RAUNAQ BAJAJ
25W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Kip Potter
14W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Eugene McNutt
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
3
David Stisher
45W–58L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
Joey Rushing
16W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Doyle Dutton
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jacob Tinsley
0W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Malachi Duncan
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Reece Carson
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Slade Berryman
5W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.