Teams

WI Adult 18&O 3.0M NEL Valley Hale

2024 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesRyan Borucki / Mitch Kroll vs Zachary Brandt / Glen Sherman4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAnthony Nooren vs Brandon Jonen6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSteve Hale / Frederick Graichen vs Chin-Yi Lin / Donald Copps1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesSteve Hale / Mitch Kroll vs Glen Sherman / Judson Beck6-0, 7-6
W#1 SinglesJames Doolin vs Zachary Brandt4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRyan Borucki / Scott Springmier vs Chin-Yi Lin / Brandon Jonen6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesRyan Borucki / Steve Hale vs Chin-Yi Lin / Brandon Jonen6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAnthony Nooren vs Zachary Brandt6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJames Doolin / Frederick Graichen vs Glen Sherman / Judson Beck6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesFrederick Graichen / Michael Campbell vs Thomas Brodhagen / Donald Copps4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMitch Kroll vs Amitesh Sharma6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesScott Springmier / David Smith vs Brandon Jonen / Zachary Brandt0-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesSteve Hale / Anthony Nooren vs Amitesh Sharma / Brandon Jonen6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJames Doolin vs Chin-Yi Lin6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Campbell / Scott Springmier vs Donald Copps / Thomas Brodhagen7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesAnthony Nooren / Ryan Borucki vs Glen Sherman / Zachary Brandt6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesMitch Kroll vs Chin-Yi Lin4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDavid Smith / Frederick Graichen vs Thomas Brodhagen / Donald Copps2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anthony Nooren
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 3.5
3.00
Steve Hale
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Mitch Kroll
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.81
Scott Springmier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Frederick Graichen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
James Doolin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ryan Borucki
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mitch Kroll + Steve Hale5166% gamesnot enough data
Scott Springmier + Steve Hale314 matchesnot enough data
Anthony Nooren + Mitch Kroll033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anthony Nooren
45W–20L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Hale
44W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.00
Mitch Kroll
26W–35L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.90
Scott Springmier
16W–26L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Frederick Graichen
3W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
James Doolin
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ryan Borucki
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.