Teams

Palm Aire Seider

2026 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter · 9.0 W Saturday

14 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-22vs Plantation PetruccelliLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichele Rose / Wendy Hillock vs Maureen Thomas / Lee Bailey6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJanet Sperling / Jennifer Peters vs Marjorie Petruccelli / Diane DeGurian4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDorene Seider / Marika Lindholm vs Lynn Deuitch / Robyn Scalzo1-6, 0-6
2026-03-14vs Sarasota/WilsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarika Lindholm / Michele Rose vs Tatyana Ayaroglu / Sue Green4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLori Faunce / Wendy Hillock vs Sally Alford / Cindy Fancher7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Dancer / Michele Krisanda vs Mary Wilson / Linda Steen6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-05vs Plantation PetruccelliWon 21
W#1 DoublesLori Faunce / Wendy Hillock vs Diane DeGurian / Ann Pfister-Brown6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Bright / Janet Sperling vs Lisa Rott / Lee Bailey6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichele Rose / Marika Lindholm vs Beth Costa / Maureen Thomas6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2026-02-21vs Sarasota/WilsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesWendy Hillock / Dorene Seider vs Sue Green / Tracy Fang2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMarika Lindholm / Michele Rose vs Mary Wilson / Tami Dalto6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Bright / Janet Sperling vs Tatyana Ayaroglu / Linda Steen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-08vs Sarasota/WilsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesWendy Hillock / Marika Lindholm vs Celia Marchese / Julie Warren4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMaria Elliott / Amy Lyons vs Sally Alford / Cindy Fancher1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Bright / Jennifer Peters vs Linda Steen / Sue Green6-2, 6-1
2026-02-07vs Plantation PetruccelliWon 21
W#1 DoublesKate Thayer-Rhodes / Janet Sperling vs Lisa Rott / Diane DeGurian6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKelly Dancer / Jennifer Peters vs Beth Costa / Lynn Deuitch3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMarika Lindholm / Maria Elliott vs Ana Areosa / Marjorie Petruccelli6-2, 6-3
2026-01-17vs Plantation PetruccelliWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Peters / Jennifer Bright vs Lynn Deuitch / Beth Costa7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJanet Sperling / Marika Lindholm vs Diane DeGurian / Marjorie Petruccelli6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichele Rose / Maria Elliott vs Lee Bailey / Lisa Rott6-1, 6-4
2026-01-10vs Sarasota/WilsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Peters / Janet Sperling vs Sue Green / Tracy Fang2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Rosenberg / Maria Elliott vs Mary Wilson / Tami Dalto6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesWendy Hillock / Michele Rose vs Cindy Fancher / Sally Alford1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Maria Elliott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.27
Marika Lindholm
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
4.26
Kelly Dancer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.23
Jennifer Bright
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.17
Michele Krisanda
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.09
Cindy Rosenberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.03
Michele Rose
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.01
Jennifer Peters
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.95
Wendy Hillock
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.92
Amy Lyons
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.60
Dorene Seider
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Janet Sperling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kate Thayer-Rhodes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lori Faunce
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Bright + Jennifer Peters312152% games−0.8% vs expected
Janet Sperling + Jennifer Peters1437% gamesnot enough data
Kate Thayer-Rhodes + Jennifer Peters4163% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Bright + Janet Sperling213 matchesnot enough data
Dorene Seider + Wendy Hillock123 matchesnot enough data
Marika Lindholm + Michele Rose123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Elliott
46W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.28
Marika Lindholm
3W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
Kelly Dancer
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.26
Jennifer Bright
100W–61L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
Michele Krisanda
145W–63L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
4.17
4
Cindy Rosenberg
81W–65L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%25%75%
4.09
Michele Rose
8W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
4.03
Jennifer Peters
65W–49L career · 5 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.01
4.5
Wendy Hillock
92W–68L career · 6 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.95
4.5
Amy Lyons
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
72%28%<1%
3.92
4
Dorene Seider
109W–119L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
Janet Sperling
18W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kate Thayer-Rhodes
37W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lori Faunce
41W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.