Teams

NNM 2.5W - Harvey

2022 USTA Adult 18 & Over League - NNM · 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-23vs NNM 2.5W HP - DunbarSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRachel Mosher / Megan Fleming vs Junting Liu-Norrod / Marti Revo7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Kelly-Smith / Stephanie Maez vs Jeannette Dunbar / Lizzy Gary2-6, 0-6
2022-05-16vs NNM 2.5 Lobo Club - MorckWon 21
W#1 DoublesRuthie Trout / Elaine Wall vs Donna Harnick / Leona Singer6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJulie Kelly-Smith vs Lori Ryan3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Higgins / Julie Hirshfield vs Rehab Kandil / Roberta Gore6-0, 6-1
2022-05-15vs NNM 2.5W TCA - TBDWon 20
W#1 DoublesDebbie Valles / Joni Lucero vs Cristina Parajon / Laura Parajon6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulie Hirshfield / Stephanie Maez vs Karen Ulack / Jennie Weese6-4, 6-2
2022-05-07vs NNM 2.5W TCA - TBDWon 21
L#1 DoublesRuthie Trout / Rachel Mosher vs Cristina Parajon / Laura Parajon2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesElaine Wall vs Maureen Keleher Kelly6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRachel Higgins / Megan Fleming vs Danielle Kuna / Jennie Weese6-0, 6-3
2022-05-05vs NNM 2.5W HP - DunbarWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoni Lucero / Debbie Valles vs Clea Gutterson / Susan Anderson6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDusti Harvey vs Dorella Molina6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRuthie Trout / Rachel Higgins vs Karen S Mendenhall / Jada Olson6-4, 6-4
2022-05-01vs NNM 2.5 Lobo Club - MorckWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoni Lucero / Debbie Valles vs Gina Grier / Lori Ryan6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesElaine Wall vs Donna Harnick6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDusti Harvey / Julie Hirshfield vs Leona Singer / Jasmin Maestas6-1, 6-0
2022-04-25vs NNM 2.5 Lobo Club - MorckSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRachel Mosher / Stephanie Maez vs Francine Morris / Patricia Suslowicz6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMegan Fleming / Julie Kelly-Smith vs Lori Ryan / Luz Gonzales3-6, 5-7
2022-04-24vs NNM 2.5W TCA - TBDWon 21
W#1 DoublesRuthie Trout / Elaine Wall vs Emma Bauchman / Maureen Keleher Kelly6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesStephanie Maez vs Jerri Hanosh5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRachel Higgins / Julie Kelly-Smith vs Danielle Kuna / Danielle Staveley7-5, 6-0
2022-04-18vs NNM 2.5W HP - DunbarWon 30
W#1 DoublesDusti Harvey / Joni Lucero vs Lizzy Gary / Clea Gutterson6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesElaine Wall vs Melissa Garcia7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRachel Higgins / Elizabeth Miller vs Marti Revo / Junting Liu-Norrod6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Debbie Valles
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
Elaine Wall
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #2 Singles 27% · published 3.5
3.24
Joni Lucero
usually #1 Doubles 82%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
2.87
Rachel Mosher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Dusti Harvey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.39
Julie Kelly-Smith
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.25
Megan Fleming
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.20
Julie Hirshfield
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Higgins
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
Ruthie Trout
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Stephanie Maez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Valles + Joni Lucero512657% games+7.6% vs expected
Julie Kelly-Smith + Megan Fleming2347% gamesnot enough data
Julie Hirshfield + Megan Fleming0537% gamesnot enough data
Dusti Harvey + Ruthie Trout404 matchesnot enough data
Ruthie Trout + Rachel Higgins404 matchesnot enough data
Julie Kelly-Smith + Julie Hirshfield314 matchesnot enough data
Julie Hirshfield + Rachel Mosher314 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Higgins + Julie Kelly-Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Debbie Valles
62W–29L career · 11 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Elaine Wall
25W–11L career · 11 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joni Lucero
67W–33L career · 11 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Rachel Mosher
88W–42L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Dusti Harvey
62W–46L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
Julie Kelly-Smith
22W–33L career · 4 lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
2.39
Megan Fleming
22W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%97%3%
2.25
Julie Hirshfield
30W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.20
Rachel Higgins
27W–22L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ruthie Trout
29W–18L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephanie Maez
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.